Cited by 25COVID-19 diagnosis using AIPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

On COVID-19 Prediction Using Asynchronous Federated Learning-Based Agile Radiograph Screening Booths

Sakib, Sadman, Fouda, Mostafa M., Md Fadlullah, Zubair, Nasser, Nidal·2021·ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications

Abstract

To combat the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) spread, the adoption of technologies including the Internet of Things (IoT) and deep learning is on the rise. However, the seamless integration of IoT devices and deep learning models for radiograph detection to identify the presence of glass opacities and other features in the lung is yet to be envisioned. Moreover, the privacy issue of the collected radiograph data and other health data of the patients has also arisen much concern. To address these challenges, in this paper, we envision a federated learning model for COVID-19 prediction from radiograph images acquired by an X-ray device within a mobile and deployable screening resource booth node (RBN). Our envisioned model permits the privacy-preservation of the acquired radiograph by performing localized learning. We further customize the proposed federated learning model by asynchronously updating the shallow and deep model parameters so that precious communication bandwidth can be spared. Based on a real dataset, the effectiveness of our envisioned approach is demonstrated and compared with baseline methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icc42927.2021.9500351

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review could not retrieve some papers ([94] and [95]) due to subscription download policies, limiting the range of the survey.

    “However, still we failed to reach some of them ( [94] and [95]) which is limiting the range of this survey.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sakib, S., Fouda, M. M., Md Fadlullah, Z., & Nasser, N.
Affiliations
  • Lakehead University (CA)
  • Idaho State University (US)
  • Alfaisal University (SA)
Venue
ICC 2021 - IEEE International Conference on Communications
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-06
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1550-3607 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3188217179
Cited by
25
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6
FWCI
6.91
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Communications (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
COVID-19 prediction, asynchronous federated learning, X-ray images, privacy preservation, Internet of Things, communication bandwidth reduction, localized learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review