Cited by 324Disaster Response and ManagementRadiology practices and educationCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Radiology Department Preparedness for COVID-19: Radiology Scientific Expert Review Panel

Open access
Mossa-Basha, Mahmud, Meltzer, Carolyn C., Kim, Danny C., Tuite, Michael J., Kolli, K. Pallav, Tan, Bien Soo·2020·Radiology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1148/radiol.2020200988

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trial staff may be able to reassure participants by sharing various safety measures such as body temperature checks, social distancing measures, hand sanitisation, surgical masks and one-way systems.

    “Trial staff may be able to reassure participants by sharing various safety measures such as body temperature checks, social distancing measures, hand sanitisation, surgical masks and one-way systems [25,26].”

    From Legacy lessons from the COVID-19 era to improve trial participation and retention: Views from trial participants, PPIE contributors and trial staff across the NIHR portfolio (2024) · cites this paper as [26]

    The ‘Top Priorities in Our Environment for COVID-19 Preparedness’ section describes symptom screening, social distancing, handwashing and masks in radiology settings. It does not specify temperature checks, hand sanitisation, surgical masks or one-way systems, and it does not assess whether sharing these measures reassures trial participants. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mossa-Basha, M., Meltzer, C. C., Kim, D. C., Tuite, M. J., Kolli, K. P., & Tan, B. S.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Meltzer, Carolyn C.
Venue
Radiology
Published
2020-08
Volume
296
Issue
2
Pages
E106-E112
ISSN
  • 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-1315
OpenAlex
W3012327600
Cited by
324
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 183
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, pandemic response, radiology practice
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Cross Infection, Expert Testimony, Health Priorities, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Radiology Department, Hospital, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Infection Control, Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review