The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Security of IoT systems: Design challenges and opportunities
Abstract
Computer-aided design (CAD), in its quest to facilitate new design revolutions, is again on the brink of changing its scope. Following both historical and recent technological and application trends, one can identify several emerging research and development directions in which CAD approaches and techniques may have major impacts. Among them, due to the potential to fundamentally alter everyday life as well as how science and engineering systems are designed and operated, the Internet of Things (IoT) stands out. IoT also poses an extraordinary system replete with conceptual and technical challenges. For instance, greatly reduced quantitative bounds on acceptable area and energy metrics require qualitative breakthroughs in design and optimization techniques. Most likely the most demanding of requirements for the widespread realization of many IoT visions is security. IoT security has an exceptionally wide scope in at least four dimensions. In terms of security scope it includes rarely addressed tasks such as trusted sensing, computation, communication, privacy, and digital forgetting. It also asks for new and better techniques for the protection of hardware, software, and data that considers the possibility of physical access to IoT devices. Sensors and actuators are common components of IoT devices and pose several unique security challenges including the integrity of physical signals and actuating events. Finally, during processing of collected data, one can envision many semantic attacks. Our strategic objective is to provide an impetus for the development of IoT CAD security techniques. We start by presenting a brief survey of IoT challenges and opportunities with an emphasis on security issues. Next, we discuss the potential of hardware-based IoT security approaches. Finally, we conclude with several case studies that advocate the use of stable PUFs and digital PPUFs for several IoT security protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rukhin, A., Sota, J., Nechvatal, J., Smid, M., Barker, E., Leigh, S., Levenson, M., Vangel, M., Banks, D., Heckert, A., et al. (2000) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-22 · Cited by 1,867
Cited by
Towards Deep-Learning-Driven Intrusion Detection for the Internet of Things
Thamilarasu, G., & Chawla, S. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19091977 · Cited by 303
A survey on privacy and security of Internet of Things
Ogonji, M. M., Okeyo, G., & Wafula, J. M. (2020) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100312 · Cited by 230
Physical Unclonable Functions in the Internet of Things: State of the Art and Open Challenges
Babaei, A., & Schiele, G. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19143208 · Cited by 168
Liu, X., Qian, C., Hatcher, W. G., Xu, H., Liao, W., & Yu, W. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2920763 · Cited by 152
Design patterns for the industrial Internet of Things
Bloom, G., Alsulami, B., Nwafor, E., & Bertolotti, I. C. (2018) · 2018 14th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS) · doi:10.1109/wfcs.2018.8402353 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, T., Wendt, J. B., & Potkonjak, M.
- Venue
- 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2014-11
- Pages
- 417-423
- OpenAlex
- W4241054193
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Security of IoT systems: Design challenges and opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccad.2014.7001385
- The paper
- Xu, T., Wendt, J. B., & Potkonjak, M. (2014). Security of IoT systems: Design challenges and opportunities. 2014 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccad.2014.7001385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.