Cited by 89IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingDigital Transformation in IndustryIndustrial Automation and Control Systems

Design patterns for the industrial Internet of Things

Bloom, Gedare, Alsulami, Bassma, Nwafor, Ebelechukwu, Bertolotti, Ivan Cibrario·2018·2018 14th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS)

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) is a vast collection of interconnected sensors, devices, and services that share data and information over the Internet with the objective of leveraging multiple information sources to optimize related systems. The technologies associated with the IoT have significantly improved the quality of many existing applications by reducing costs, improving functionality, increasing access to resources, and enhancing automation. The adoption of IoT by industries has led to the next industrial revolution: Industry 4.0. The rise of the Industrial IoT (IIoT) promises to enhance factory management, process optimization, worker safety, and more. However, the rollout of the IIoT is not without significant issues, and many of these act as major barriers that prevent fully achieving the vision of Industry 4.0. One major area of concern is the security and privacy of the massive datasets that are captured and stored, which may leak information about intellectual property, trade secrets, and other competitive knowledge. As a way forward toward solving security and privacy concerns, we aim in this paper to identify common input-output (I/O) design patterns that exist in applications of the IIoT. These design patterns enable constructing an abstract model representation of data flow semantics used by such applications, and therefore better understand how to secure the information related to IIoT operations. In this paper, we describe communication protocols and identify common I/O design patterns for IIoT applications with an emphasis on data flow in edge devices, which, in the industrial control system (ICS) setting, are most often involved in process control or monitoring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wfcs.2018.8402353

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bloom, G., Alsulami, B., Nwafor, E., & Bertolotti, I. C.
Affiliations
  • Howard University (US)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Institute of Electronics, Computer and Telecommunication Engineering (IT)
Venue
2018 14th IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
1-10
OpenAlex
W2838525302
Cited by
89
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 3
FWCI
11.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
Keywords
Industrial Internet of Things, design patterns, security (computing), privacy, communication protocols, edge devices, industrial control systems, process control, monitoring, Industry 4.0, intellectual property protection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review