The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employing Transfer-Learning based CNN architectures to Enhance the Generalizability of Deepfake Detection
Abstract
Advancements in machine learning have given rise to technologies and methodologies that are being put to use for immoral purposes, especially after the inception of Generative Adversarial Networks in 2014. Generative Adversarial Networks are capable of synthesizing hyper-realistic fake images and even videos. Various sophisticated machine learning techniques capable of creating ultra-realistic Deep Fake videos are being used to harass, blackmail women and children, induce political instability by spreading false, malicious propaganda which could in turn lead to social, political conflicts and outbursts with dire consequences. This poses a serious threat to personal safety and also endangers national security which calls for automated ways to detect deep fake videos. This paper proposes a method to expose such fake videos by using a CNN architecture and leveraging the technique of Transfer Learning. The proposed model implements an algorithm that uses a CNN for feature extraction from every frame in a video to train a binary classifier that learns to efficiently differentiate between real and manipulated videos. The method is evaluated against an extensive set of deepfake videos gathered from various datasets.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Suratkar et al. (2020)'s findings demonstrate that using TL to develop a relatively robust model for deep fake detection is doable.
“So, the findings demonstrate that using TL to develop a relatively robust model for deep fake detection is doable.”
From Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review (2024) · cites this paper as Suratkar et al. (2020)
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
In Ictu Oculi: Exposing AI Created Fake Videos by Detecting Eye Blinking
Li, Y., Chang, M.-C., & Lyu, S. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) · doi:10.1109/wifs.2018.8630787 · Cited by 1,089
The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Dataset
Dolhansky, B., Howes, R., Pflaum, B., Baram, N., & Ferrer, C. C. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.08854 · Cited by 413
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- 10.1109/AVSS.2018.8639163 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TKDE.2009.191 · DOI · Paper page
- torrey, 2009, Transfer learning, Handbook Of Research On Machine Learning Applications and Trends Algorithms Methods and Techniques, 242
- yosinski, 0, How transferable are features in deep neural networks?, Advances in neural information processing systems, 3320
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00907 · DOI
- howard, 2017, Mobilenets Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.195 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICALIP.2018.8455775 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICPR.2018.8545633 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8683164 · DOI · Paper page
- 0, faceswap-gan
- li, 0, Exposing DeepFake videos by detecting face warping artifacts, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 46
- makhzani, 2015, Adversarial autoencoders
- 10.1109/WIFS.2018.8630761 · DOI · Paper page
- goodfellow, 0, Generative adversarial nets, Advances in neural information processing systems, 2672
- 10.1109/ICCV.2019.00009 · DOI · Paper page
- dufour, 2019, Deepfakes detection dataset by google & jigsaw
- 10.1145/2929464.2929475 · DOI
- 0, faceswap github
- king, 2009, Dlib-ml: A machine learning toolkit, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 1755
- 10.1145/3306346.3323035 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deepfake detection using deep learning methods: A systematic and comprehensive review
Heidari, A., Jafari Navimipour, N., Dag, H., & Unal, M. (2024) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1520 · Cited by 349
“Suratkar et al. (2020) developed a system for detecting false videos that use a CNN architecture and the TL methodology.”
MethodA Novel Blockchain-Based Deepfake Detection Method Using Federated and Deep Learning Models
Heidari, A., Navimipour, N. J., Dag, H., Talebi, S., & Unal, M. (2024) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-024-10255-7 · Cited by 164
Deepfakes: current and future trends
Gambín, Á. F., Yazidi, A., Vasilakos, A., Haugerud, H., & Djenouri, Y. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10679-x · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- Suratkar, S., Johnson, E., Variyambat, K., Panchal, M., & Kazi, F.
- Venue
- 2020 11th International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-07
- Pages
- 1-9
- OpenAlex
- W3094477634
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, transfer learning, convolutional neural networks, generative adversarial networks, video manipulation, feature extraction, misinformation, national security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review