The Deepfake Detection Challenge (DFDC) Preview Dataset
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we introduce a preview of the Deepfakes Detection Challenge (DFDC) dataset consisting of 5K videos featuring two facial modification algorithms. A data collection campaign has been carried out where participating actors have entered into an agreement to the use and manipulation of their likenesses in our creation of the dataset. Diversity in several axes (gender, skin-tone, age, etc.) has been considered and actors recorded videos with arbitrary backgrounds thus bringing visual variability. Finally, a set of specific metrics to evaluate the performance have been defined and two existing models for detecting deepfakes have been tested to provide a reference performance baseline. The DFDC dataset preview can be downloaded at: deepfakedetectionchallenge.ai
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The DFDC dataset does not indicate whether the visual component or speech is manipulated in the video.
“It does not indicate whether the visual component or speech is manipulated in the video.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The Introduction (p. 1) says the dataset’s labels describe whether videos were generated using facial manipulation techniques. Dataset Construction (p. 3) also says its metadata lists swapped and target identities for each video. Thus, the paper does indicate visual face manipulation, contrary to the claim; it does not discuss speech-manipulation labels. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDFDC-preview is the initial version of the DFDC dataset, containing 1131 real videos and 4119 manipulated videos.
“DFDC-preview is the initial version of the DFDC dataset containing 1131 real videos and 4119 manipulated videos and is available on Kaggle.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Dataset Construction (p. 2) calls the preview the first version of the DFDC dataset. But Table 1 (p. 3) gives 5,214 total videos, whereas the claimed 1,131 real and 4,119 manipulated videos sum to 5,250. The paper does not give those claimed category counts. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDFDC is a multimodal deepfake dataset comprising nearly 120,000 videos, of which 100,000 are labeled as fake and the remaining as real.
“DFDC [52] (DeepFake Detection Challenge) is a multimodal deepfake dataset comprising nearly 120,000 videos, of which 100,000 are labeled as fake and the remaining as real.”
From Deepfake Media Forensics: Status and Future Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as [52]
The Introduction (p. 1) identifies DFDC as a video dataset with labels distinguishing manipulated from original footage. But this paper describes a preview dataset: Table 1 in Dataset Construction (p. 3) lists 5,214 videos. Our copy does not substantiate the claimed nearly 120,000 videos, the 100,000-fake split, or the multimodal characterization. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDFDC has a 3:1 ratio of fake to real videos, while CelebDF has nearly 5 times more fake videos.
“For instance, DFDC [37] has a 3:1 ratio of fake to real videos, while CelebDF [38] has nearly 5 times more fake videos.”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
Table 1 (Dataset Construction, p. 3) gives the DFDC Preview Dataset’s tampered-to-original ratio as 1:0.28, or about 3.6:1, rather than 3:1. It also describes the preview dataset, not necessarily the full DFDC dataset. The Celeb-DF clause has a separate citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is a lack of multimodal deepfake datasets in the literature, while monomodal ones are widely available.
“This poses an additional challenge since there is a lack of multimodal deepfake datasets proposed in the literature, while monomodal ones are widely available.”
From A Robust Approach to Multimodal Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
The Introduction (p. 1) lists several published datasets for detecting manipulated facial footage, supporting the point that visual deepfake datasets are available. It does not compare monomodal and multimodal datasets or state that multimodal datasets are scarce; searches for those terms and for audio–visual datasets found no such discussion. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Few multimodal datasets containing both counterfeited video and audio tracks have been proposed: DFDC, FakeAVCeleb, and DeepfakeTIMIT with TIMIT-TTS.
“In the recent years, few multimodal datasets have been proposed, containing both counterfeited video and audio tracks.”
From A Robust Approach to Multimodal Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
The Introduction (p. 1) and Dataset Construction (p. 2) identify DFDC as a dataset of videos with manipulated faces, supporting its identification as a counterfeited-video dataset. They describe face swaps but do not establish that the audio tracks are also counterfeited. This source also does not establish the claim about FakeAVCeleb or DeepFakeTIMIT with TIMIT-TTS. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe DFDC dataset scaled data collection to over 100,000 clips from paid actors with explicit consent, offering a large training and evaluation substrate and reporting generalization considerations from a major public challenge.
“The DFDC dataset scaled data collection to over 100,000 clips from paid actors with explicit consent, offering a large training and evaluation substrate and reporting generalization considerations from a major public challenge [35].”
From A Review of Tools and Technologies to Combat Deepfakes (2026) · cites this paper as [35]
The Introduction (p. 1) says the videos came from paid actors who agreed to use of their likenesses, and Dataset Construction (p. 3) describes training and test clips. But this paper reports a preview of about 5,000 clips—not over 100,000—and its evaluation discussion (p. 3) concerns proposed metrics and baseline results, not findings from a completed public challenge. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFoundational benchmarks have been instrumental in advancing the accuracy of deepfake detectors.
“Foundational benchmarks have been instrumental in advancing the accuracy of deepfake detectors.”
From From Black Boxes to Glass Boxes: Explainable AI for Trustworthy Deepfake Forensics (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The Introduction (p. 1) says deepfake datasets are used to train and evaluate detectors and that the DFDC challenge aims to invigorate detection research. It does not establish that benchmarks have already advanced detector accuracy, as the claim asserts. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe DFDC dataset is the largest available deepfake detection dataset, containing around 100,000 manipulated videos and 23,000 original samples with 960 different identities.
“The DFDC dataset is currently the largest available deepfake detection dataset containing around 100,000 manipulated videos and 23,000 original samples having 960 different identities.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The Introduction (p. 1) identifies the DFDC as a deepfake-detection dataset, and Table 1 (Dataset Construction, p. 3) lists its preview as the largest dataset in that comparison, at 5,214 videos. This paper describes a preview using 66 individuals (Dataset Construction, p. 2); it does not substantiate the claimed 100,000 manipulated videos, 23,000 originals, or 960 identities for the full DFDC dataset. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe DFDC dataset includes both manipulated audios and videos but labels the entire video as fake.
“The dataset includes both manipulated audios and videos, however, labels the entire video as fake.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The Introduction (p. 1) says the dataset contains videos with labels indicating whether they were generated using facial manipulation techniques, supporting video-level fake labels. Dataset Construction (pp. 2–3) describes face swaps, but our copy does not say the dataset includes manipulated audio. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe DFDC dataset includes thousands of video files labeled as real or fake, featuring diverse facial characteristics, expressions, and angles.
“It includes thousands of video files labeled as real or fake, featuring diverse facial characteristics, expressions, and angles.”
From Enhancing Deepfake Detection Through Quantum Transfer Learning and Class-Attention Vision Transformer Architecture (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
The Introduction (p. 1) describes around 5,000 original and manipulated videos with labels indicating facial manipulation. Dataset Construction (pp. 1–2) describes varied facial attributes and head poses, supporting diversity in characteristics and angles. Our copy does not establish that the videos feature diverse facial expressions. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDuring validation, when log-WP was maximized over each fold, the recall reminder was at the optimal level, that is -3.044 for TamperNet, -2.14 for XceptionNet (face), and -3.352 for XceptionNet (Full).
“During the validation, it was clearly observed that when log-WP was maximized over each fold, the recall reminder was at the optimal level, that is -3.044 for TamperNet, -2.14 for XceptionNet (face), and -3.352 for XceptionNet (Full), respectively.”
From A Comprehensive Review of DeepFake Detection Using Advanced Machine Learning and Fusion Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
The Baseline section (p. 4) says cross-validation selected thresholds that maximized log-WP over each fold while maintaining a desired recall level. But Table 2 (Evaluation metrics, p. 3) identifies −3.044, −2.140, and −3.352 as log-WP values, not recall values; the corresponding recalls are 0.033, 0.084, and 0.268. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDFDC Preview consists of 5K videos with two facial modification algorithms.
“DeepFakes Detection Challenge Preview (DFDC Preview) (Dolhansky et al. 2019) dataset consisting of 5K videos with two facial modification algorithms.”
From Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon (2022) · cites this paper as Dolhansky et al. 2019
Visual modality datasets dominate with over 20 publicly available resources, while audio modality datasets are fewer, with 11 notable datasets.
“Visual modality datasets dominate with over 20 publicly available resources [29, 30, 30-44], while audio modality datasets are fewer, with 11 notable datasets [45-55].”
From Deepfake detection across image, video, and audio: a comprehensive survey with empirical evaluation of generalization and robustness (2026) · cites this paper as [37]
The details of the algorithms used for manipulation in the DFDC dataset are not revealed.
“The details of the algorithms used for manipulation are not revealed.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
The DFDC dataset is one of the largest and most diverse datasets used for deepfake detection.
“Furthermore, the DFDC dataset is one of the largest and most diverse datasets used for deepfake detection.”
From Enhancing Deepfake Detection Through Quantum Transfer Learning and Class-Attention Vision Transformer Architecture (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
In the DFDC dataset, synthetic audios are not lip-synced with the corresponding videos and are labeled as fake even if the original voice is replaced with a different person's voice.
“Additionally, the synthetic audios are not lip-synced with the corresponding videos and are labeled as fake even if the original voice is replaced with a different person's voice.”
From Attention-based Multimodal learning framework for Generalized Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection (2023) · cites this paper as [9]
Dataset Construction (pp. 2–3) describes face swaps, and the Introduction (p. 1) describes labels for videos with manipulated faces. Our copy does not address synthetic audio, lip synchronization, or whether replacing a voice alone receives a fake label (searched for audio synchronization and voice replacement). (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images
Rossler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Niessner, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00009 · Cited by 3,314 · see citing works
Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3213954 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
FaceForensics: A Large-scale Video Dataset for Forgery Detection in Human Faces
Rössler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Nießner, M. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.09179 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence, Deepfakes and a Future of Ectypes
Floridi, L. (2018) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-018-0325-3 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Celeb-DF: A New Dataset for DeepFake ForensicsPreprint
Li, Y., Yang, X., Sun, P., Qi, H., & Lyu, S. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Development of a video tampering dataset for forensic investigation
Al-Sanjary, O. I., Ahmed, A. A., & Sulong, G. (2016) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.013 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Celeb-DF: A Large-Scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensics
Li, Y., Yang, X., Sun, P., Qi, H., & Lyu, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00327 · Cited by 1,846 · see citing works
“To date, we have the UADFV dataset [53], the DeepFake-TIMIT dataset (DF-TIMIT) [25], the FaceForenscics++ dataset (FF-DF) [40] 2 , the Google Deep-Fake detection dataset (DFD) [15], and the FaceBook Deep-Fake detection challenge (DFDC) dataset [14].”
MethodDeepfakes and beyond: A Survey of face manipulation and fake detection
Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., Morales, A., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014 · Cited by 1,237 · see citing works
Media Forensics and DeepFakes: An Overview
Verdoliva, L. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.3002101 · Cited by 979 · see citing works
The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Survey
Mirsky, Y., & Lee, W. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3425780 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
DeeperForensics-1.0: A Large-Scale Dataset for Real-World Face Forgery Detection
Jiang, L., Li, R., Wu, W., Qian, C., & Loy, C. C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00296 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Literature Review
Rana, M. S., Nobi, M. N., Murali, B., & Sung, A. H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3154404 · Cited by 573 · see citing works
Masood, M., Nawaz, M., Malik, K. M., Javed, A., Irtaza, A., & Malik, H. (2023) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-022-03766-z · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Detecting Deepfakes with Self-Blended Images
Shiohara, K., & Yamasaki, T. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.01816 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Two-Branch Recurrent Network for Isolating Deepfakes in Videos
Masi, I., Killekar, A., Mascarenhas, R. M., Gurudatt, S. P., & AbdAlmageed, W. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58571-6_39 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Survey
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., Nguyen, T. T., Pham, Q.-V., & Nguyen, C. M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11573 · Cited by 464
Deep learning for deepfakes creation and detection: A survey
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., Huynh-The, T., Nahavandi, S., Nguyen, T. T., Pham, Q.-V., & Nguyen, C. M. (2022) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103525 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
WildDeepfake: A Challenging Real-World Dataset for Deepfake Detection
Zi, B., Chang, M., Chen, J., Ma, X., & Jiang, Y.-G. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413769 · Cited by 448 · see citing works
The deepfake detection challenge (dfdc) dataset
Dolhansky, B., Bitton, J., Pflaum, B., Lu, J., Howes, R., Wang, M., & Ferrer, C. C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.07397 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning Self-Consistency for Deepfake Detection
Zhao, T., Xu, X., Xu, M., Ding, H., Xiong, Y., & Xia, W. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01475 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Local Relation Learning for Face Forgery Detection
Chen, S., Yao, T., Chen, Y., Ding, S., Li, J., & Ji, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i2.16193 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Emotions Don't Lie: An Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection Method using Affective Cues
Mittal, T., Bhattacharya, U., Chandra, R., Bera, A., & Manocha, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413570 · Cited by 319 · see citing works
DeepFake Detection Based on Discrepancies Between Faces and Their Context
Nirkin, Y., Wolf, L., Keller, Y., & Hassner, T. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3093446 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
DeepFake Detection for Human Face Images and Videos: A Survey
Malik, A., Kuribayashi, M., Abdullahi, S. M., & Khan, A. N. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3151186 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
A Survey on Deepfake Video Detection
Yu, P., Xia, Z., Fei, J., & Lu, Y. (2021) · IET Biometrics · doi:10.1049/bme2.12031 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds
Groh, M., Epstein, Z., Firestone, C., & Picard, R. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2110013119 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Detecting Deep-Fake Videos from Appearance and Behavior
Agarwal, S., Farid, H., El-Gaaly, T., & Lim, S.-N. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS) · doi:10.1109/wifs49906.2020.9360904 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
“The Deep Fake Detection Challenge Preview dataset (DFDC-P) [29] consists of 1131 real and 4113 face-swap deep fakes videos of 66 individuals of various genders, ages and ethnicities.”
BackgroundInfluentialDeepfake Detection: Current Challenges and Next Steps
Lyu, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW) · doi:10.1109/icmew46912.2020.9105991 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Recurrent convolutional structures for audio spoof and video deepfake detection
Chintha, A., Thai, B., Sohrawardi, S. J., Bhatt, K., Hickerson, A., Wright, M., & Ptucha, R. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2020.2999185 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Not made for each other- Audio-Visual Dissonance-based Deepfake Detection and Localization
Chugh, K., Gupta, P., Dhall, A., & Subramanian, R. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413700 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
DeepRhythm: Exposing DeepFakes with Attentional Visual Heartbeat Rhythms
Qi, H., Guo, Q., Juefei-Xu, F., Xie, X., Ma, L., Feng, W., Liu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3394171.3413707 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Imran, M., Ofli, F., Caragea, D., & Torralba, A. B. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102261 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Hierarchical Fine-Grained Image Forgery Detection and Localization
Guo, X., Liu, X., Ren, Z., Grosz, S. A., Masi, I., & Liu, X. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00308 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
A review on social spam detection: Challenges, open issues, and future directions
Rao, S., Verma, A. K., & Bhatia, T. (2021) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115742 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
ID-Reveal: Identity-aware DeepFake Video Detection
Cozzolino, D., Rossler, A., Thies, J., Niesner, M., & Verdoliva, L. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01483 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Adversarial Deepfakes: Evaluating Vulnerability of Deepfake Detectors to Adversarial Examples
Hussain, S., Neekhara, P., Jere, M., Koushanfar, F., & McAuley, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv48630.2021.00339 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities
Kaur, A., Noori Hoshyar, A., Saikrishna, V., Firmin, S., & Xia, F. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10810-6 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Countering Malicious DeepFakes: Survey, Battleground, and Horizon
Juefei-Xu, F., Wang, R., Huang, Y., Guo, Q., Ma, L., & Liu, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-022-01606-8 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“DFDC Preview (Dolhansky et al., 2019) 5,214 - - 1,131 4,113”
MethodSpatiotemporal Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detection
Gu, Z., Chen, Y., Yao, T., Ding, S., Li, J., Huang, F., & Ma, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3474085.3475508 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
One Shot Face Swapping on Megapixels
Zhu, Y., Li, Q., Wang, J., Xu, C., & Sun, Z. (2021) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00480 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
AVoiD-DF: Audio-Visual Joint Learning for Detecting Deepfake
Yang, W., Zhou, X., Chen, Z., Guo, B., Ba, Z., Xia, Z., Cao, X., & Ren, K. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3262148 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Deepfake generation and detection: Case study and challenges
Patel, Y., Tanwar, S., Gupta, R., Bhattacharya, P., Davidson, I. E., Nyameko, R., Aluvala, S., & Vimal, V. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3342107 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
ISTVT: Interpretable Spatial-Temporal Video Transformer for Deepfake Detection
Zhao, C., Wang, C., Hu, G., Chen, H., Liu, C., & Tang, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3239223 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Deepfakes Detection with Automatic Face Weighting
Montserrat, D. M., Hao, H., Yarlagadda, S. K., Baireddy, S., Shao, R., Horvath, J., Bartusiak, E., Yang, J., Guera, D., Zhu, F., et al. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw50498.2020.00342 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
StyleNeRF: A Style-based 3D-Aware Generator for High-resolution Image SynthesisPreprint
Gu, J., Liu, L., Wang, P., & Theobalt, C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08985 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Adversarial Machine Learning-Industry Perspectives
Kumar, R. S. S., Nystrom, M., Lambert, J., Marshall, A. D., Goertzel, M., Comissoneru, A., Swann, M., & Xia, S. (2020) · IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw50608.2020.00028 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
F <sup>2</sup> Trans: High-Frequency Fine-Grained Transformer for Face Forgery Detection
Miao, C., Tan, Z., Chu, Q., Liu, H., Hu, H., & Yu, N. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3233774 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Yu, K., Chen, C., Hu, X., & Peng, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00703 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
A Novel Blockchain-Based Deepfake Detection Method Using Federated and Deep Learning Models
Heidari, A., Navimipour, N. J., Dag, H., Talebi, S., & Unal, M. (2024) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-024-10255-7 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Zhou, T., Wang, W., Liang, Z., & Shen, J. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00572 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Transcending Forgery Specificity with Latent Space Augmentation for Generalizable Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Luo, Y., Lyu, S., Liu, Q., & Wu, B. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00858 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
KoDF: A Large-scale Korean DeepFake Detection Dataset
Kwon, P., You, J., Nam, G., Park, S., & Chae, G. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01057 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Masked Relation Learning for DeepFake Detection
Yang, Z., Liang, J., Xu, Y., Zhang, X., & He, R. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3249566 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Deepfakes Detection Techniques Using Deep Learning: A Survey
Almars, A. M. (2021) · Journal of Computer and Communications · doi:10.4236/jcc.2021.95003 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Anti-Forensics for Face Swapping Videos via Adversarial Training
Ding, F., Zhu, G., -, Y. L., Zhang, X., Atrey, P. K., & Lyu, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2021.3098422 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
HifiFace: 3D Shape and Semantic Prior Guided High Fidelity Face Swapping
Wang, Y., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Chu, W., Tai, Y., Wang, C., Li, J., Wu, Y., Huang, F., & Ji, R. (2021) · Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/157 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
FrePGAN: Robust Deepfake Detection Using Frequency-Level Perturbations
Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Ro, Y., & Choi, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i1.19990 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
CORE: Consistent Representation Learning for Face Forgery Detection
Ni, Y., Meng, D., Yu, C., Quan, C., Ren, D., & Zhao, Y. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw56347.2022.00011 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Deep Learning for Deepfakes Creation and Detection: A Survey
Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, M. C., Nguyen, D. T., Nguyen, D. T., & Nahavandi, S. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12731039.v1 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
FReTAL: Generalizing Deepfake Detection using Knowledge Distillation and Representation Learning
Kim, M., Tariq, S., & Woo, S. S. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00111 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Mitra, A., Mohanty, S. P., Corcoran, P., & Kougianos, E. (2021) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-021-00495-x · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Adversarial Threats to DeepFake Detection: A Practical Perspective
Neekhara, P., Dolhansky, B., Bitton, J., & Ferrer, C. C. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw53098.2021.00103 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationFakeAVCeleb: A Novel Audio-Video Multimodal Deepfake Dataset
Khalid, H., Tariq, S., Kim, M., & Woo, S. S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.05080 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Beyond the Prior Forgery Knowledge: Mining Critical Clues for General Face Forgery Detection
Luo, A., Kong, C., Huang, J., Hu, Y., Kang, X., & Kot, A. C. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3332218 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
(2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68821-9_38 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Hierarchical Frequency-Assisted Interactive Networks for Face Manipulation Detection
Miao, C.-T., Tan, Z., Chu, Q., Yu, N.-H., & Guo, G.-D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2022.3198275 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Deepfake Detection: A Comprehensive Survey from the Reliability Perspective
Wang, T., Liao, X., Chow, K. P., Lin, X., & Wang, Y. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3699710 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
PRRNet: Pixel-Region relation network for face forgery detection
Shang, Z., Xie, H., Zha, Z.-J., Yu, L., Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107950 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Das, S., Seferbekov, S., Datta, A., Islam, M. S., & Amin, M. R. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW) · doi:10.1109/iccvw54120.2021.00421 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
BiHPF: Bilateral High-Pass Filters for Robust Deepfake Detection
Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Min, S., Joe, S., Gwon, Y., & Choi, J. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00293 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Preventing DeepFake Attacks on Speaker Authentication by Dynamic Lip Movement Analysis
Yang, C.-Z., Ma, J., Wang, S., & Liew, A. W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2020.3045937 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Deepfake Detection using Spatiotemporal Convolutional NetworksPreprint
de Lima, O., Franklin, S., Basu, S., Karwoski, B., & George, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14749 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Audio-Visual Person-of-Interest DeepFake Detection
Cozzolino, D., Pianese, A., Nießner, M., & Verdoliva, L. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw59228.2023.00101 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Exploring Frequency Adversarial Attacks for Face Forgery Detection
Jia, S., Ma, C., Yao, T., Yin, B., Ding, S., & Yang, X. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00407 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Testing human ability to detect ‘deepfake’ images of human faces
Bray, S. D., Johnson, S. D., & Kleinberg, B. (2023) · Journal of Cybersecurity · doi:10.1093/cybsec/tyad011 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Review of DeepFake Detection Using Advanced Machine Learning and Fusion Methods
Gupta, G., Raja, K., Gupta, M., Jan, T., Whiteside, S. T., & Prasad, M. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics13010095 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Ganguly, S., Ganguly, A., Mohiuddin, S., Malakar, S., & Sarkar, R. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118423 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
DeepfakeBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark of Deepfake Detection
Yan, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, X., Lyu, S., & Wu, B. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01426 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
“Users can choose from a list of supported dataset names such as FaceForensics++ [33], Celeb-DF-v1 [23], Celeb-DF-v2 [23], DFDCP [11], DFDC [10], DeeperForensics-1.”
BackgroundMethodCreating, Using, Misusing, and Detecting Deep Fakes
Farid, H. (2022) · Journal of Online Trust and Safety · doi:10.54501/jots.v1i4.56 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Noise Based Deepfake Detection via Multi-Head Relative-Interaction
Wang, T., & Chow, K. P. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26701 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
One Detector to Rule Them All: Towards a General Deepfake Attack Detection Framework
Tariq, S., Lee, S., & Woo, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 · doi:10.1145/3442381.3449809 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Dynamic Difference Learning With Spatio–Temporal Correlation for Deepfake Video Detection
Yin, Q., Lu, W., Li, B., & Huang, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3290752 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Delving into the Local: Dynamic Inconsistency Learning for DeepFake Video Detection
Gu, Z., Chen, Y., Yao, T., Ding, S., Li, J., & Ma, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i1.19955 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Disrupting Image-Translation-Based DeepFake Algorithms with Adversarial Attacks
Yeh, C.-Y., Chen, H.-W., Tsai, S.-L., & Wang, S.-D. (2020) · IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw50321.2020.9096939 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
FInfer: Frame Inference-Based Deepfake Detection for High-Visual-Quality Videos
Hu, J., Liao, X., Liang, J., Zhou, W., & Qin, Z. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i1.19978 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
DFDT: An End-to-End DeepFake Detection Framework Using Vision Transformer
Khormali, A., & Yuan, J.-S. (2022) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12062953 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Detecting fake images by identifying potential texture difference
Yang, J., Xiao, S., Li, A., Lan, G., & Wang, H. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2021.06.043 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
NGUYEN, D., MEJRI, N., SINGH, I. P., KULESHOVA, P., ASTRID, M., KACEM, A., GHORBEL, E., & AOUADA, D. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01647 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
DFFMD: A Deepfake Face Mask Dataset for Infectious Disease Era With Deepfake Detection Algorithms
Alnaim, N. M., Almutairi, Z. M., Alsuwat, M. S., Alalawi, H. H., Alshobaili, A., & Alenezi, F. S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3246661 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Chen, H., Lin, Y., Li, B., & Tan, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2022.3209336 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Towards Measuring Fairness in AI: The Casual Conversations Dataset
Hazirbas, C., Bitton, J., Dolhansky, B., Pan, J., Gordo, A., & Ferrer, C. C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science · doi:10.1109/tbiom.2021.3132237 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Self-citationDetecting Deepfake Videos with Temporal Dropout 3DCNN
Zhang, D., Li, C., Lin, F., Zeng, D., & Ge, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.24963/ijcai.2021/178 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Guo, Z., Jia, Z., Wang, L., Wang, D., Yang, G., & Kasabov, N. K. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2023.3324739 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
AUNet: Learning Relations Between Action Units for Face Forgery Detection
Bai, W., Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, B., & Hu, W. (2023) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02367 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Tolosana, R., Romero-Tapiador, S., Vera-Rodríguez, R., González-Sosa, E., & Fiérrez, J. (2022) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104673 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Privacy Intelligence: A Survey on Image Privacy in Online Social Networks
Liu, C., Zhu, T., Zhang, J., & Zhou, W. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3547299 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
iCaps-Dfake: An Integrated Capsule-Based Model for Deepfake Image and Video Detection
Khalil, S. S., Youssef, S. M., & Saleh, S. N. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13040093 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
TextStyleBrush: Transfer of Text Aesthetics From a Single Example
Krishnan, P., Kovvuri, R., Pang, G., Vassilev, B., & Hassner, T. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2023.3239736 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Deepfake Video Detection Based on EfficientNet-V2 Network
Deng, L., Suo, H., & Li, D. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/3441549 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Lewis, J. K., Toubal, I. E., Chen, H., Sandesera, V., Lomnitz, M., Hampel-Arias, Z., Prasad, C., & Palaniappan, K. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR) · doi:10.1109/aipr50011.2020.9425167 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Rethinking gradient operator for exposing AI-enabled face forgeries
Guo, Z., Yang, G., Zhang, D., & Xia, M. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.119361 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
DeepFake on Face and Expression Swap: A Review
Waseem, S., Abu Bakar, S. A. R. S., Ahmed, B. A., Omar, Z., Eisa, T. A. E., & Dalam, M. E. E. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3324403 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Peng, C., Miao, Z., Liu, D., Wang, N., Hu, R., & Gao, X. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3381823 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Deepfake Video Detection via Predictive Representation Learning
Ge, S., Lin, F., Li, C., Zhang, D., Wang, W., & Zeng, D. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3536426 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Face Forgery Detection via Multi-Feature Fusion and Local Enhancement
Zhang, D., Chen, J., Liao, X., Li, F., Chen, J., & Yang, G. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3390945 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
El‐Shafai, W., Fouda, M. A., El‐Rabaie, E. M., & Abdel-Salam, N. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15609-1 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dolhansky, B., Howes, R., Pflaum, B., Baram, N., & Ferrer, C. C.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2019
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1910.08854
- OpenAlex
- W2980459401
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
- Keywords
- deepfake detection, DFDC, face manipulation, synthetic video, video forensics, evaluation metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
