Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 91Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsHuman Pose and Action Recognition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

YOLO Based Real-Time Human Detection for Smart Video Surveillance at the Edge

Nguyen, Huy Hoang, Ta, Thi Nhung, Nguyen, Ngoc Cuong, Bui, Van Truong, Pham, Hung Manh, Nguyen, Duc Minh·2021·2020 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE)

Abstract

Recently, smart video surveillance at the edge has become a trend in developing security applications since edge computing enables more image processing tasks to be implemented on the decentralised network note of the surveillance system. As a result, many security applications such as behaviour recognition and prediction, employee safety, perimeter intrusion detection and vandalism deterrence can minimise their latency or even process in real-time when the camera network system is extended to a larger degree. Technically, human detection is a key step in the implementation of these applications. With the advantage of high detection rates, deep learning methods have been widely employed on edge devices in order to detect human objects. However, due to their high computation costs, it is challenging to apply these methods on resource limited edge devices for real-time applications. Inspired by the You Only Look Once (YOLO), residual learning and Spatial Pyramid Pooling (SPP), a novel form of real-time human detection is presented in this paper. Our approach focuses on designing a network structure so that the developed model can achieve a good trade-off between accuracy and processing time. Experimental results show that our trained model can process 2 FPS on Raspberry PI 3B and detect humans with accuracies of 95.05 % and 96.81 % when tested respectively on INRIA and PENN FUDAN datasets. On the human COCO test dataset, our trained model outperforms the performance of the Tiny-YOLO versions. Additionally, compare to the SSD based L-CNN method, our algorithm achieves better accuracy than the other method.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icce48956.2021.9352144

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1109/CIC.2018.00042 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 0, PENN-FUDAN dataset
  3. 0, INRIA dataset
  4. bhuvaneswari, 2009, Edgelet based human detection and tracking by combined segmentation and soft decision, International Conference on Control Automation Communication and Energy Conservation
  5. dung, 2012, Fast human detection based on parallelogram Haar-like features, 38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON)
  6. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383134 · DOI
  7. eng, 0, A Bayesian framework for robust human detection and occlusion handling human shape model, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition ICPR 2004
  8. adiono, 2018, HOG-AdaBoost Implementation for Human Detection Employing FPGA ALTERA DE2-115, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9, 10.14569/IJACSA.2018.091042 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 · DOI · Paper page
  11. he, 2018, Mask R-CNN, IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  12. liu, 2015, SSD: Single shot multibox detector, IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  13. 0, Darknet
  14. 10.1109/EDGE.2018.00025 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.imavis.2019.02.010 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · DOI · Paper page
  17. bay, 2006, SURF: Speed Up Robust Feature, ECCV 2006, 3951, 404
  18. dalal, 2015, Histograms of orirented gradients for human detection, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  19. 10.1007/978-3-540-75757-3_35 · DOI
  20. nguyen, 0, Turnstile jumping detection in real-time video surveillance, Image and Video Technology PSIVT 2019 LNCS, 11854
  21. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.690 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1109/ICCVW.2019.00303 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, H. H., Ta, T. N., Nguyen, N. C., Bui, V. T., Pham, H. M., & Nguyen, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Trường Đại học Khoa học và Công nghệ Hà Nội (VN)
  • Vietnam Posts and Telecommunications Group (Vietnam) (VN)
Venue
2020 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-01-13
Pages
439-444
OpenAlex
W3132764101
Cited by
91
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Communications and Electronics (ICCE) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
real-time human detection, YOLO, edge computing, video surveillance, spatial pyramid pooling, residual learning, resource-constrained edge devices, Raspberry Pi, object detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.