Deep Learning based Framework for Automatic Damage Detection in Aircraft Engine Borescope Inspection
Abstract
To ensure high safety in civil aviation, borescope inspection has been widely applied in early damage detection of aircraft engines. Current manual damage inspection on borescope images inevitably results in low efficiency for engine status inspection. Traditional recognition methods are inefficient for damage detection due to complicated and noisy scenarios inside them. In this paper, a deep learning based framework is proposed which utilizes the state-of-the-art algorithm called Fully Convolutional Networks (FCN) to identify and locate damages from borescope images. Our framework can successfully identify two major types of damages, namely crack and burn, from borescope images and extract their region on these images with high prediction accuracy. Moreover, by applying the fine-tuning method, the proposed framework is further optimized to significantly reduce the amount of training data. With experiments on real borescope images data from one major airline company, we validate the efficiency and accuracy of our proposed framework through comparisons with other CNN architectures for damage identification and recognition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Borescope inspection has limited accessibility, creating the need to use different borescope tips, which leads to high variation of images.
“Furthermore, there is limited accessibility, which creates the need to use different borescope tips, which in turn leads to a high variation of images [9].”
From Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
There is a lack of recent applications of classical image processing techniques to blade inspection.
“There is a lack of recent applications of these techniques to blade inspection. In fact, the field is somewhat weak and has been dominated by the neural networks and deep learning approaches instead [9,19,47,85].”
From Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
CNN approaches for crack and erosion detection typically achieved high accuracy of detection.
“All of these approaches use some form of feature extraction or segmentation techniques to normalise the input into a trained CNN and typically achieved a high accuracy of detection.”
From Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
All these CNN applications required large quantities of training data.
“Additionally, all these applications required large quantities of training data.”
From Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
The training examples used in CNN approaches were of advanced damage that is clearly visible to the human eye.
“However, the training examples were of advanced damage that is clearly visible to the human eye.”
From Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Engine parts such as shafts, fan blades, compressor blades and turbine blades are safety-critical to flight operations.
“Engine parts such as shafts [31,32], fan blades [20,33], compressor blades [9,34,35] and turbine blades [9,26,36-43] are also of particular interest as all are safety-critical to flight operations.”
From Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
Most research focuses on defect detection on turbine blades rather than compressor blades, mainly crack detection.
“Furthermore, most research focuses on defect detection on turbine blades rather than compressor blades. This encompasses mainly crack detection [9,33,37,38,42], as this is the most critical type of defect and the main source of failure.”
From Automated Defect Detection and Decision-Support in Gas Turbine Blade Inspection (2021) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 45
- Authors
- Shen, Z., Wan, X., Ye, F., Guan, X., & Liu, S.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing Tech University (CN)
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Dayton, Ohio, USA
- Venue
- 2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-02
- Pages
- 1005-1010
- ISSN
- 2325-2626 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2940447691
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 13.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- 2012 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- damage detection, crack detection, fully convolutional network, damage localization, fine-tuning, training data reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review