The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BraMBLe: a Bayesian multiple-blob tracker
Abstract
Blob trackers have become increasingly powerful in recent years largely due to the adoption of statistical appearance models which allow effective background subtraction and robust tracking of deforming foreground objects. It has been standard, however, to treat background and foreground modelling as separate processes-background subtraction is followed by blob detection and tracking-which prevents a principled computation of image likelihoods. This paper presents two theoretical advances which address this limitation and lead to a robust multiple-person tracking system suitable for single-camera real-time surveillance applications. The first innovation is a multi-blob likelihood function which assigns directly comparable likelihoods to hypotheses containing different numbers of objects. This likelihood function has a rigorous mathematical basis: it is adapted from the theory of Bayesian correlation, but uses the assumption of a static camera to create a more specific background model while retaining a unified approach to background and foreground modelling. Second we introduce a Bayesian filter for tracking multiple objects when the number of objects present is unknown and varies over time. We show how a particle filter can be used to perform joint inference on both the number of objects present and their configurations. Finally we demonstrate that our system runs comfortably in real time on a modest workstation when the number of blobs in the scene is small.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CONDENSATION—Conditional Density Propagation for Visual Tracking
Isard, M., & Blake, A. (1998) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1008078328650 · Cited by 4,886
Self-citation
Cited by
Robust object tracking with online multiple instance learning
Babenko, B., Yang, M.-H., & Belongie, S. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.226 · Cited by 2,007
Monocular Pedestrian Detection: Survey and Experiments
Enzweiler, M., & Gavrila, D. M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.260 · Cited by 1,213
Globally-optimal greedy algorithms for tracking a variable number of objects
Pirsiavash, H., Ramanan, D., & Fowlkes, C. C. (2011) · CVPR 2011 · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995604 · Cited by 790
Object Detection and Tracking for Autonomous Navigation in Dynamic Environments
Ess, A., Schindler, K., Leibe, B., & Van Gool, L. (2010) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364910365417 · Cited by 191
Metadata
- Authors
- Isard, M., & MacCormick, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-13
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 34-41
- OpenAlex
- W2117082318
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.13
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BraMBLe: a Bayesian multiple-blob tracker. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2001.937594
- The paper
- Isard, M., & MacCormick, J. (2002). BraMBLe: a Bayesian multiple-blob tracker. Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2001.937594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.