The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SCRAMSAC: Improving RANSAC's efficiency with a spatial consistency filter
Abstract
Geometric verification with RANSAC has become a crucial step for many local feature based matching applications. Therefore, the details of its implementation are directly relevant for an application's run-time and the quality of the estimated results. In this paper, we propose a RANSAC extension that is several orders of magnitude faster than standard RANSAC and as fast as and more robust to degenerate configurations than PROSAC, the currently fastest RANSAC extension from the literature. In addition, our proposed method is simple to implement and does not require parameter tuning. Its main component is a spatial consistency check that results in a reduced correspondence set with a significantly increased inlier ratio, leading to faster convergence of the remaining estimation steps. In addition, we experimentally demonstrate that RANSAC can operate entirely on the reduced set not only for sampling, but also for its consensus step, leading to additional speed-ups. The resulting approach is widely applicable and can be readily combined with other extensions from the literature. We quantitatively evaluate our approach's robustness on a variety of challenging datasets and compare its performance to the state-of-the-art.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
A comparison of affine region detectors
Mikolajczyk, K., Tuytelaars, T., Schmid, C., Zisserman, A., Matas, J., Schaffalitzky, F., Kadir, T., & Gool, L. V. (2005) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-005-3848-x · Cited by 2,939
Randomized RANSAC with T, test
Matas, J., & Chum, O. (2004) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2004.02.009 · Cited by 281
Cited by
USAC: A Universal Framework for Random Sample Consensus
Raguram, R., Chum, O., Pollefeys, M., Matas, J., & Frahm, J.-M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.257 · Cited by 676
GMS: Grid-Based Motion Statistics for Fast, Ultra-Robust Feature Correspondence
Bian, J., Lin, W.-Y., Matsushita, Y., Yeung, S.-K., Nguyen, T.-D., & Cheng, M.-M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.302 · Cited by 594
Grauman, K., & Leibe, B. (2011) · Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning · doi:10.2200/s00332ed1v01y201103aim011 · Cited by 126
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sattler, T., Leibe, B., & Kobbelt, L.
- Venue
- 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-09
- Pages
- 2090-2097
- OpenAlex
- W2533007775
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SCRAMSAC: Improving RANSAC's efficiency with a spatial consistency filter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv.2009.5459459
- The paper
- Sattler, T., Leibe, B., & Kobbelt, L. (2009). SCRAMSAC: Improving RANSAC's efficiency with a spatial consistency filter. 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2009.5459459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.