The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Latent structured models for human pose estimation
Abstract
We present an approach for automatic 3D human pose reconstruction from monocular images, based on a discriminative formulation with latent segmentation inputs. We advanced the field of structured prediction and human pose reconstruction on several fronts. First, by working with a pool of figure-ground segment hypotheses, the prediction problem is formulated in terms of combined learning and inference over segment hypotheses and 3D human articular configurations. Beside constructing tractable formulations for the combined segment selection and pose estimation problem, we propose new augmented kernels that can better encode complex dependencies between output variables. Furthermore, we provide primal linear re-formulations based on Fourier kernel approximations, in order to scale-up the non-linear latent structured prediction methodology. The proposed models are shown to be competitive in the HumanEva benchmark and are also illustrated in a clip collected from a Hollywood movie, where the model can infer human poses from monocular images captured in complex environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object Detection with Discriminatively Trained Part-Based Models
Felzenszwalb, P. F., Girshick, R. B., McAllester, D., & Ramanan, D. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.167 · Cited by 9,853
Cited by
ScanNet: Richly-Annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenes
Dai, A., Chang, A. X., Savva, M., Halber, M., Funkhouser, T., & Niessner, M. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.261 · Cited by 4,368
Human3.6M: Large Scale Datasets and Predictive Methods for 3D Human Sensing in Natural Environments
Ionescu, C., Papava, D., Olaru, V., & Sminchisescu, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.248 · Cited by 3,653
Self-citationSUN RGB-D: A RGB-D scene understanding benchmark suite
Song, S., Lichtenberg, S. P., & Xiao, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298655 · Cited by 1,943
Anipose: A toolkit for robust markerless 3D pose estimation
Karashchuk, P., Rupp, K. L., Dickinson, E. S., Walling-Bell, S., Sanders, E., Azim, E., Brunton, B. W., & Tuthill, J. C. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109730 · Cited by 324
Günel, S., Rhodin, H., Morales, D., Campagnolo, J., Ramdya, P., & Fua, P. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.48571 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Ionescu, C., Li, F., & Sminchisescu, C.
- Venue
- 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-11
- Pages
- 2220-2227
- OpenAlex
- W2118931255
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.