Cited by 1,943Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Vision and Imaging3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

SUN RGB-D: A RGB-D scene understanding benchmark suite

Song, Shuran, Lichtenberg, Samuel P., Xiao, Jianxiong·2015·2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Although RGB-D sensors have enabled major break-throughs for several vision tasks, such as 3D reconstruction, we have not attained the same level of success in high-level scene understanding. Perhaps one of the main reasons is the lack of a large-scale benchmark with 3D annotations and 3D evaluation metrics. In this paper, we introduce an RGB-D benchmark suite for the goal of advancing the state-of-the-arts in all major scene understanding tasks. Our dataset is captured by four different sensors and contains 10,335 RGB-D images, at a similar scale as PASCAL VOC. The whole dataset is densely annotated and includes 146,617 2D polygons and 64,595 3D bounding boxes with accurate object orientations, as well as a 3D room layout and scene category for each image. This dataset enables us to train data-hungry algorithms for scene-understanding tasks, evaluate them using meaningful 3D metrics, avoid overfitting to a small testing set, and study cross-sensor bias.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298655

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gemini Robotics-ER achieves a new state-of-the-art on the SUN-RGBD 3D object detection benchmark.

    “with Gemini Robotics-ER achieving a new stateof-the-art on the SUN-RGBD benchmark.”

    From Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World (2025) · cites this paper as Song et al., 2015

  • Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking surpasses Gemini-2.5-Pro by 5.2 points on the SUN RGB-D dataset.

    “Specifically, on the SUN RGB-D dataset (Song et al., 2015), the Qwen3-VL-235B-A22B-Thinking variants surpass the performance of Gemini-2.5-Proby 5.2 points.”

    From Qwen3-VL Technical Report (2025) · cites this paper as Song et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, S., Lichtenberg, S. P., & Xiao, J.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Venue
2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2015-06
Pages
567-576
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1923184257
Cited by
1,943
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 117 · 2025: 232 · 2024: 266 · 2023: 262 · 2022: 223 · 2021: 238 · 2020: 162 · 2019: 172 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 4
FWCI
37.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
benchmark dataset, 3D annotation, 3D bounding boxes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review