Cited by 127Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data ClassificationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

On Network Design Spaces for Visual Recognition

Open access
Radosavovic, Ilija, Johnson, Justin, Xie, Saining, Lo, Wan-Yen, Dollar, Piotr·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Over the past several years progress in designing better neural network architectures for visual recognition has been substantial. To help sustain this rate of progress, in this work we propose to reexamine the methodology for comparing network architectures. In particular, we introduce a new comparison paradigm of distribution estimates, in which network design spaces are compared by applying statistical techniques to populations of sampled models, while controlling for confounding factors like network complexity. Compared to current methodologies of comparing point and curve estimates of model families, distribution estimates paint a more complete picture of the entire design landscape. As a case study, we examine design spaces used in neural architecture search (NAS). We find significant statistical differences between recent NAS design space variants that have been largely overlooked. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that the design spaces for standard model families like ResNeXt can be comparable to the more complex ones used in recent NAS work. We hope these insights into distribution analysis will enable more robust progress toward discovering better networks for visual recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00197

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An efficient point-voxel CNN is proposed for efficient 3D learning and can help implement 3D AR/VR applications and SLAM of autonomous driving on edge systems.

    “Like [218], an efficient point-voxel CNN is proposed for efficient 3D learning, and this model can help to implement 3D AR/VR applications and SLAM [219] of autonomous driving on edge systems.”

    From Bringing ai to edge: from deep learning’s perspective (2022) · cites this paper as [219]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. R. Luo, F. Tian, T. Qin, E. Chen, and T.-Y. Liu. Neural ar- chitecture optimization. In NIPS, 2018. 2

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Radosavovic, I., Johnson, J., Xie, S., Lo, W.-Y., & Dollar, P.
Affiliations
Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
1882-1890
OpenAlex
W2947546116
Cited by
127
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
neural architecture search, visual recognition, neural network architecture comparison, model families, ResNeXt, network complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review