Cited by 583D Shape Modeling and AnalysisAdvanced Vision and ImagingAdvanced Neural Network Applications

3D Scene Reconstruction With Multi-Layer Depth and Epipolar Transformers

Open access
Shin, Daeyun, Ren, Zhile, Sudderth, Erik, Fowlkes, Charless·2019·2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

We tackle the problem of automatically reconstructing a complete 3D model of a scene from a single RGB image. This challenging task requires inferring the shape of both visible and occluded surfaces. Our approach utilizes viewer-centered, multi-layer representation of scene geometry adapted from recent methods for single object shape completion. To improve the accuracy of view-centered representations for complex scenes, we introduce a novel "Epipolar Feature Transformer" that transfers convolutional network features from an input view to other virtual camera viewpoints, and thus better covers the 3D scene geometry. Unlike existing approaches that first detect and localize objects in 3D, and then infer object shape using category-specific models, our approach is fully convolutional, end-to-end differentiable, and avoids the resolution and memory limitations of voxel representations. We demonstrate the advantages of multi-layer depth representations and epipolar feature transformers on the reconstruction of a large database of indoor scenes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv.2019.00226

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several surveys dedicated to Transformers have been recently introduced, with a range of emphases.

    “Several surveys dedicated to Transformers have been recently introduced, with a range of emphases including general Transformers [48], efficient designs [49], visualization [50], computer vision tasks [51], [52], [53], [54], medical imaging [55], video tasks [56], and vision language pretraining [57].”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [50]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

13 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hamid Izadinia, Qi Shan, and Steven M Seitz. Im2cad. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2017. 3
  2. Andrea Nicastro, Ronald Clark, and Stefan Leutenegger. X- section: Cross-section prediction for enhanced rgbd fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2019. 3
  3. Edward Smith, Scott Fujimoto, and David Meger. Multi- view silhouette and depth decomposition for high resolution 3d object representation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pages 6479-6489, 2018. 3
  4. Edward J. Smith and David Meger. Improved adversarial systems for 3d object generation and reconstruction. In 1st Annual Conference on Robot Learning, CoRL 2017, Moun- tain View, California, USA, November 13-15, 2017, Proceed- ings, pages 87-96, 2017. 3
  5. Jiajun Wu, Yifan Wang, Tianfan Xue, Xingyuan Sun, Bill Freeman, and Josh Tenenbaum. Marrnet: 3d shape recon- struction via 2.5 d sketches. In Advances in Neural Informa- tion Processing Systems (NeurIPS), pages 540-550, 2017. 3
  6. Jiajun Wu, Chengkai Zhang, Xiuming Zhang, Zhoutong Zhang, William T Freeman, and Joshua B Tenenbaum. Learning 3D Shape Priors for Shape Completion and Recon- struction. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2018. 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shin, D., Ren, Z., Sudderth, E., & Fowlkes, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
2172-2182
OpenAlex
W2970295759
Cited by
57
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13
FWCI
10.16
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1730158, 1253538, 1618806)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
3D scene reconstruction, single-image 3D reconstruction, indoor scenes, fully convolutional network

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review