The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance Fields
Open accessAbstract
The rendering procedure used by neural radiance fields (NeRF) samples a scene with a single ray per pixel and may therefore produce renderings that are excessively blurred or aliased when training or testing images observe scene content at different resolutions. The straightforward solution of supersampling by rendering with multiple rays per pixel is impractical for NeRF, because rendering each ray requires querying a multilayer perceptron hundreds of times. Our solution, which we call "mip-NeRF" (à la "mipmap"), extends NeRF to represent the scene at a continuously-valued scale. By efficiently rendering anti-aliased conical frustums instead of rays, mip-NeRF reduces objectionable aliasing artifacts and significantly improves NeRF’s ability to represent fine details, while also being 7% faster than NeRF and half the size. Compared to NeRF, mip-NeRF reduces average error rates by 17% on the dataset presented with NeRF and by 60% on a challenging multiscale variant of that dataset that we present. Mip-NeRF is also able to match the accuracy of a brute-force supersampled NeRF on our multiscale dataset while being 22× faster.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric
Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A. A., Shechtman, E., & Wang, O. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00068 · Cited by 14,623
In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unit
Jouppi, N. P., Young, C., Patil, N., Patterson, D., Agrawal, G., Bajwa, R., Bates, S., Bhatia, S., Boden, N., Borchers, A., et al. (2017) · Proceedings of the 44th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture · doi:10.1145/3079856.3080246 · Cited by 4,537
Levoy, M., & Hanrahan, P. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237199 · Cited by 3,755
Gortler, S. J., Grzeszczuk, R., Szeliski, R., & Cohen, M. F. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237200 · Cited by 2,458
Modeling and rendering architecture from photographs: a hybrid geometry- and image-based approach
Debevec, P. E., Taylor, C. J., & Malik, J. (1996) · Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/237170.237191 · Cited by 1,905
An improved illumination model for shaded display
Whitted, T. (1980) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358876.358882 · Cited by 1,768
Fourier Features Let Networks Learn High Frequency Functions in Low Dimensional Domains
Tancik, M., Srinivasan, P. P., Mildenhall, B., Fridovich-Keil, S., Raghavan, N., Singhal, U., Ramamoorthi, R., Barron, J. T., & Ng, R. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.10739 · Cited by 1,459
Self-citationNeRF in the Wild: Neural Radiance Fields for Unconstrained Photo Collections
Martin-Brualla, R., Radwan, N., Sajjadi, M. S. M., Barron, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., & Duckworth, D. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00713 · Cited by 1,374
Self-citation
Cited by
3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering
Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimkuehler, T., & Drettakis, G. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3592433 · Cited by 6,025
DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generation
Ruiz, N., Li, Y., Jampani, V., Pritch, Y., Rubinstein, M., & Aberman, K. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.12242 · Cited by 2,442
DreamBooth: Fine Tuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Subject-Driven Generation
Ruiz, N., Li, Y., Jampani, V., Pritch, Y., Rubinstein, M., & Aberman, K. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.02155 · Cited by 2,295
Direct Voxel Grid Optimization: Super-fast Convergence for Radiance Fields Reconstruction
Sun, C., Sun, M., & Chen, H.-T. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00538 · Cited by 939
RegNeRF: Regularizing Neural Radiance Fields for View Synthesis from Sparse Inputs
Niemeyer, M., Barron, J. T., Mildenhall, B., Sajjadi, M. S. M., Geiger, A., & Radwan, N. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00540 · Cited by 609
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barron, J. T., Mildenhall, B., Tancik, M., Hedman, P., Martin-Brualla, R., & Srinivasan, P. P.
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-10
- Pages
- 5835-5844
- OpenAlex
- W3136327392
- Cited by
- 1,921
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 194.77
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance Fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00580
- The paper
- Barron, J. T., Mildenhall, B., Tancik, M., Hedman, P., Martin-Brualla, R., & Srinivasan, P. P. (2021). Mip-NeRF: A Multiscale Representation for Anti-Aliasing Neural Radiance Fields. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
