Cited by 553Human Motion and AnimationGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis3D Shape Modeling and Analysis

AI Choreographer: Music Conditioned 3D Dance Generation with AIST++

Open access
Li, Ruilong, Yang, Shan, Ross, David A., Kanazawa, Angjoo·2021·2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

We present AIST++, a new multi-modal dataset of 3D dance motion and music, along with FACT, a Full-Attention Cross-modal Transformer network for generating 3D dance motion conditioned on music. The proposed AIST++ dataset contains 5.2 hours of 3D dance motion in 1408 sequences, covering 10 dance genres with multi-view videos with known camera poses—the largest dataset of this kind to our knowledge. We show that naively applying sequence models such as transformers to this dataset for the task of music conditioned 3D motion generation does not produce satisfactory 3D motion that is well correlated with the input music. We overcome these shortcomings by introducing key changes in its architecture design and supervision: FACT model involves a deep cross-modal transformer block with full-attention that is trained to predict N future motions. We empirically show that these changes are key factors in generating long sequences of realistic dance motion that are well-attuned to the input music. We conduct extensive experiments on AIST++ with user studies, where our method outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods both qualitatively and quantitatively. The code and the dataset can be found at: https://google.github.io/aichoreographer.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv48922.2021.01315

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Simple prediction-based late fusion is less adopted in MML Transformers.

    “We note that the simple prediction-based late fusion [247], [248] is less adopted in MML Transformers.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [248]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, R., Yang, S., Ross, D. A., & Kanazawa, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Google (United States) (US)
Venue
2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-10
Pages
13381-13392
OpenAlex
W3204221554
Cited by
553
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 92 · 2025: 146 · 2024: 154 · 2023: 113 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 2
FWCI
117.49
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Human Motion and Animation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Keywords
cross-modal transformer, full attention, AIST, dance genres, choreography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review