Cited by 605Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionVideo Analysis and Summarization

End-to-End Dense Video Captioning with Masked Transformer

Open access
Zhou, Luowei, Zhou, Yingbo, Corso, Jason J., Socher, Richard, Xiong, Caiming·2018·2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Dense video captioning aims to generate text descriptions for all events in an untrimmed video. This involves both detecting and describing events. Therefore, all previous methods on dense video captioning tackle this problem by building two models, i.e. an event proposal and a captioning model, for these two sub-problems. The models are either trained separately or in alternation. This prevents direct influence of the language description to the event proposal, which is important for generating accurate descriptions. To address this problem, we propose an end-to-end transformer model for dense video captioning. The encoder encodes the video into appropriate representations. The proposal decoder decodes from the encoding with different anchors to form video event proposals. The captioning decoder employs a masking network to restrict its attention to the proposal event over the encoding feature. This masking network converts the event proposal to a differentiable mask, which ensures the consistency between the proposal and captioning during training. In addition, our model employs a self-attention mechanism, which enables the use of efficient non-recurrent structure during encoding and leads to performance improvements. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this end-to-end model on ActivityNet Captions and YouCookII datasets, where we achieved 10.12 and 6.58 METEOR score, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2018.00911

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kaleido-BERT is a VLP Transformer model tailor-made for the fashion domain.

    “Kaleido-BERT [212] is a VLP Transformer model tailor-made for the fashion domain.”

    From Multimodal learning with transformers: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [212]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, L., Zhou, Y., Corso, J. J., Socher, R., & Xiong, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Salesforce (United States) (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-06
Pages
8739-8748
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963351113
Cited by
605
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 111 · 2022: 107 · 2021: 114 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 6
FWCI
16.47
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750, FA8750-17-2-0112)
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-15-1-0354, W911NF-15-1-, W911NF, W911NF-15)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
Keywords
dense video captioning, masked transformer, end-to-end learning, attention masking, self-attention, video description generation, untrimmed video, ActivityNet Captions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review