Cited by 154Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Vision and Imaging

SparseBEV: High-Performance Sparse 3D Object Detection from Multi-Camera Videos

Open access
Liu, Haisong, Teng, Yao, Lu, Tao, Wang, Haiguang, Wang, Limin·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Camera-based 3D object detection in BEV (Bird’s Eye View) space has drawn great attention over the past few years. Dense detectors typically follow a two-stage pipeline by first constructing a dense BEV feature and then performing object detection in BEV space, which suffers from complex view transformations and high computation cost. On the other side, sparse detectors follow a query-based paradigm without explicit dense BEV feature construction, but achieve worse performance than the dense counterparts. In this paper, we find that the key to mitigate this performance gap is the adaptability of the detector in both BEV and image space. To achieve this goal, we propose SparseBEV, a fully sparse 3D object detector that outperforms the dense counterparts. SparseBEV contains three key designs, which are (1) scale-adaptive self attention to aggregate features with adaptive receptive field in BEV space, (2) adaptive spatio-temporal sampling to generate sampling locations under the guidance of queries, and (3) adaptive mixing to decode the sampled features with dynamic weights from the queries. On the test split of nuScenes, SparseBEV achieves the state-of-the-art performance of 67.5 NDS. On the val split, SparseBEV achieves 55.8 NDS while maintaining a real-time inference speed of 23.5 FPS. Code is available at https://github.com/MCG-NJU/SparseBEV.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01703

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • On the R2R navigation benchmark, early sequence-based models Seq2Seq and SF had poor global path optimization and performed poorly in unseen environments.

    “Early sequence-based models like Seq2Seq [265] and SF [266] struggled with global path optimization, leading to poor performance in unseen environments.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H., Teng, Y., Lu, T., Wang, H., & Wang, L.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University (CN)
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Pages
18534-18544
OpenAlex
W4390873371
Cited by
154
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 40
FWCI
16.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
bird's-eye view, multi-camera video, real-time inference, nuScenes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review