Cited by 68Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

VQA-GNN: Reasoning with Multimodal Knowledge via Graph Neural Networks for Visual Question Answering

Open access
Wang, Yanan, Yasunaga, Michihiro, Ren, Hongyu, Wada, Shinya, Leskovec, Jure·2023·2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Visual question answering (VQA) requires systems to perform concept-level reasoning by unifying unstructured (e.g., the context in question and answer; “QA context”) and structured (e.g., knowledge graph for the QA context and scene; “concept graph”) multimodal knowledge. Existing works typically combine a scene graph and a concept graph of the scene by connecting corresponding visual nodes and concept nodes, then incorporate the QA context representation to perform question answering. However, these methods only perform a unidirectional fusion from unstructured knowledge to structured knowledge, limiting their potential to capture joint reasoning over the heterogeneous modalities of knowledge. To perform more expressive reasoning, we propose VQA-GNN, a new VQA model that performs bidirectional fusion between unstructured and structured multimodal knowledge to obtain unified knowledge representations. Specifically, we inter-connect the scene graph and the concept graph through a super node that represents the QA context, and introduce a new multimodal GNN technique to perform inter-modal message passing for reasoning that mitigates representational gaps between modalities. On two challenging VQA tasks (VCR and GQA), our method outperforms strong baseline VQA methods by 3.2% on VCR (Q-AR) and 4.6% on GQA, suggesting its strength in performing concept-level reasoning. Ablation studies further demonstrate the efficacy of the bidirectional fusion and multimodal GNN method in unifying unstructured and structured multimodal knowledge.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51070.2023.01973

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MGA and MGNNS demonstrate that heterogeneous GNNs and multi-channel architectures can effectively bridge structural and semantic modality gaps by integrating multimodal graph representations.

    “In addition, models such as MGA [69] and MGNNS [70] demonstrate that heterogeneous GNNs and multi-channel architectures can effectively bridge structural and semantic modality gaps by integrating multimodal graph representations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Yasunaga, M., Ren, H., Wada, S., & Leskovec, J.
Affiliations
  • KDDI Research (Japan) (JP)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-10-01
Pages
21525-21535
OpenAlex
W4390873421
Cited by
68
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 4
FWCI
7.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Microsoft
  • Masason Foundation
  • Apple
  • Hitachi
  • Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
visual question answering, graph neural networks, scene graph, conceptual graphs, knowledge graphs, GQA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review