PreprintCited by 956Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsTopic ModelingVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representations

Open access
Su, Weijie, Zhu, Xizhou, Cao, Yue, Li, Bin, Lu, Lewei, Wei, Furu, Dai, Jifeng·2019·arXiv

Abstract

We introduce a new pre-trainable generic representation for visual-linguistic tasks, called Visual-Linguistic BERT (VL-BERT for short). VL-BERT adopts the simple yet powerful Transformer model as the backbone, and extends it to take both visual and linguistic embedded features as input. In it, each element of the input is either of a word from the input sentence, or a region-of-interest (RoI) from the input image. It is designed to fit for most of the visual-linguistic downstream tasks. To better exploit the generic representation, we pre-train VL-BERT on the massive-scale Conceptual Captions dataset, together with text-only corpus. Extensive empirical analysis demonstrates that the pre-training procedure can better align the visual-linguistic clues and benefit the downstream tasks, such as visual commonsense reasoning, visual question answering and referring expression comprehension. It is worth noting that VL-BERT achieved the first place of single model on the leaderboard of the VCR benchmark. Code is released at \url{https://github.com/jackroos/VL-BERT}.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1908.08530

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vision Transformers are commonly evaluated using the sliding window procedure from MMSegmentation.

    “Vision Transformers are commonly evaluated using the sliding window procedure from MMSegmentation [59] (e.g., [10, 101, 103]).”

    From MultiMAE: Multi-modal Multi-task Masked Autoencoders (2022) · cites this paper as [59]

    The Introduction (p. 2) describes VL-BERT as a model for visual-linguistic tasks, and the detailed experiment settings (p. 14) describe its pre-training and fine-tuning. Searches for “sliding window MMSegmentation” and “semantic segmentation evaluation sliding window Vision Transformers” found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed evaluation practice. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ross Girshick. Fast r-cnn. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision , pp. 1440-1448, 2015.
  2. Ryan Kiros, Yukun Zhu, Ruslan R Salakhutdinov, Richard Zemel, Raquel Urtasun, Antonio Torralba, and Sanja Fidler. Skip-thought vectors. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 3294-3302, 2015.
  3. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 1097-1105, 2012.
  4. Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, and Ilya Sutskever. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI Blog , 1(8), 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, W., Zhu, X., Cao, Y., Li, B., Lu, L., Wei, F., & Dai, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969876226
Cited by
950
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 170 · 2023: 255 · 2022: 194 · 2021: 197 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
pre-training, multimodal transformer, region of interest features, visual commonsense reasoning, visual question answering, referring expression comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review