Cited by 42Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsRobot Manipulation and Learning

LLaVA-3D: A Simple Yet Effective Pathway to Empowering LMMs with 3D Capabilities

Open access
Zhu, Chenming, Wang, Tai, Zhang, Wenwei, Pang, Jiangmiao, Liu, Xihui·2025·2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Abstract

Recent advancements in Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have greatly enhanced their proficiency in 2D visual understanding tasks, enabling them to effectively process and understand images and videos. However, the development of LMMs with 3D scene understanding capabilities has been hindered by the lack of large-scale 3D vision-language datasets and powerful 3D encoders. In this paper, we introduce a simple yet effective framework called LLaVA-3D. Leveraging the strong 2D visual understanding priors from LLaVA, our LLaVA-3D efficiently adapts LLaVA for 3D scene understanding without compromising 2D understanding capabilities. To achieve this, we utilize the 3D position embeddings to enhance the 2D CLIP Patches with 3D spatial context information and construct 3D patches. By integrating the 3D position embeddings into 2D LMMs and employing joint 2D and 3D vision-language instruction tuning, we establish a unified architecture for both 2D visual understanding and 3D scene understanding. In contrast to previous 3D LMMs, LLaVA-3D supports decoding accurate 3D spatial perception outputs, e.g., 3D bounding boxes, directly from these 3D patches, without relying on the time-consuming off-the-shelf 3D segmentors. Experimental results show that LLaVA-3D converges 3.5x faster than existing 3D LMMs when trained on 3D vision-language datasets. Moreover, LLaVA-3D not only achieves state-of-the-art performance across various 3D tasks but also maintains comparable 2D visual understanding and vision-language conversation capabilities with LLaVA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccv51701.2025.00409

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Grounding MLLMs in the real world presents significant challenges for models' visual-spatial intelligence.

    “grounding MLLMs in the real world presents significant challenges for models' visual-spatial intelligence, motivating recent efforts [10, 13, 16, 29, 41, 48, 94, 107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, C., Wang, T., Zhang, W., Pang, J., & Liu, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CN)
Venue
2025 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2025-10-19
Pages
4295-4305
OpenAlex
W7160158679
Cited by
42
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 7
FWCI
25.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
large language models, 3D vision, 3D object understanding, multimodal language models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review