Cited by 966Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning

Alayrac, Jean-Baptiste, Donahue, Jeff, Luc, Pauline, Miech, Antoine, Barr, Iain, Hasson, Yana, Lenc, Karel, Mensch, Arthur +19 more·2022·Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35

Abstract

Building models that can be rapidly adapted to novel tasks using only a handful of annotated examples is an open challenge for multimodal machine learning research. We introduce Flamingo, a family of Visual Language Models (VLM) with this ability. We propose key architectural innovations to: (i) bridge powerful pretrained vision-only and language-only models, (ii) handle sequences of arbitrarily interleaved visual and textual data, and (iii) seamlessly ingest images or videos as inputs. Thanks to their flexibility, Flamingo models can be trained on large-scale multimodal web corpora containing arbitrarily interleaved text and images, which is key to endow them with in-context few-shot learning capabilities. We perform a thorough evaluation of our models, exploring and measuring their ability to rapidly adapt to a variety of image and video tasks. These include open-ended tasks such as visual question-answering, where the model is prompted with a question which it has to answer, captioning tasks, which evaluate the ability to describe a scene or an event, and close-ended tasks such as multiple-choice visual question-answering. For tasks lying anywhere on this spectrum, a single Flamingo model can achieve a new state of the art with few-shot learning, simply by prompting the model with task-specific examples. On numerous benchmarks, Flamingo outperforms models fine-tuned on thousands of times more task-specific data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52202/068431-1723

Cites

154 of 154 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vision-language models combine a language model with an image encoder and are trained on text-image pairs, enabling prediction of word continuations in the context of an image.

    “vision-language models (VLMs) such as VilBERT 19 and Flamingo 2 combine a language model with an image encoder and are trained on a multi-modal corpus of text-image pairs.This enables them to predict how a given sequence of words will continue in the context of a given image.”

    From Talking about Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

  • The latest generation of language models are multimodal, allowing interleaved image and text input.

    “the latest generation of language models are multimodal, allowing interleaved image and text input (OpenAI, 2023a; Alayrac et al., 2022; Team et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023b)”

    From Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Alayrac et al., 2022

  • Switch Transformer was one of the first MoE-based Transformers, activating experts selectively in each layer, reducing computational overhead while outperforming dense Transformers in NLP tasks.

    “The Switch Transformer [201] was one of the first MoE-based Transformers, activating experts selectively in each layer, reducing computational overhead while outperforming dense Transformers in NLP tasks.”
  • The dominant architectural paradigm connects specialized, external multimodal encoders-such as CLIP for vision or CLAP for audio-to the LLM backbone via alignment modules like Q-Former or simple MLPs, a modular design that allows for independent encoder updates without retraining the entire model.

    “The dominant architectural paradigm connects specialized, external multimodal encoders-such as CLIP for vision or CLAP for audio-to the LLM backbone via alignment modules like Q-Former or simple MLPs [19, 86, 615, 1139], a modular design that allows for independent encoder updates without retraining the entire model [624].”

    From A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [19]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alayrac, J.-B., Donahue, J., Luc, P., Miech, A., Barr, I., Hasson, Y., Lenc, K., Mensch, A., Millican, K., Reynolds, M., Ring, R., Rutherford, E., Cabi, S., Han, T., Gong, Z., Samangooei, S., Monteiro, M., Menick, J. L., Borgeaud, S., Brock, A., Nematzadeh, A., Sharifzadeh, S., Binkowski, M., Barreira, R., Vinyals, O., Zisserman, A., & Simonyan, K.
Venue
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35
Published
2022
Pages
23716-23736
ISSN
1049-5258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7133196460
Cited by
966
References
154
Citations by year
2026: 847 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
15.48
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • neural information processing systems (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
vision-language models, few-shot learning, image-text models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review