Cited by 97Multimodal Machine Learning Applications3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisRobot Manipulation and Learning

LL3DA: Visual Interactive Instruction Tuning for Omni-3D Understanding, Reasoning, and Planning

Open access
Chen, Sijin, Chen, Xin, Zhang, Chi, Li, Mingsheng, Yu, Gang, Fei, Hao, Zhu, Hongyuan, Fan, Jiayuan +1 more·2024·2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Abstract

Recent progress in Large Multimodal Models (LMM) has opened up great possibilities for various applications in the field of human-machine interactions. However, developing LMMs that can comprehend, reason, and plan in complex and diverse 3D environments remains a challenging topic, especially considering the demand for understanding permutation-invariant point cloud representations of the 3D scene. Existing works seek help from multi-view images by projecting 2D features to 3D space, which inevitably leads to huge computational overhead and performance degradation. In this paper, we present LL3DA, a Large Language 3D Assistant that takes point cloud as the direct input and responds to both text instructions and visual interactions. The additional visual interaction enables LMMs to better comprehend human interactions with the 3D environment and further remove the ambiguities within plain texts. Experiments show that LL3DA achieves remarkable results and surpasses various 3D vision-language models on both 3D Dense Captioning and 3D Question Answering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02496

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Optimization techniques, gradient modulation, and adaptive architectures help balance training under modality imbalance.

    “To mitigate this, optimization techniques, gradient modulation, and adaptive architectures [304,305] help balance training.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, S., Chen, X., Zhang, C., Li, M., Yu, G., Fei, H., Zhu, H., Fan, J., & Chen, T.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • Tencent (China) (CN)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
Venue
2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-06-16
Pages
26418-26428
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402716423
Cited by
92
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 13
FWCI
19.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
instruction tuning, large language models, point clouds, visual interaction, 3D scene understanding, human-machine interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review