Cited by 36Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningAdvanced Vision and Imaging

Multi-task Learning Using Multi-modal Encoder-Decoder Networks with Shared Skip Connections

Kuga, Ryohei, Kanezaki, Asako, Samejima, Masaki, Sugano, Yusuke, Matsushita, Yasuyuki·2017·2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)

Abstract

Multi-task learning is a promising approach for efficiently and effectively addressing multiple mutually related recognition tasks. Many scene understanding tasks such as semantic segmentation and depth prediction can be framed as cross-modal encoding/decoding, and hence most of the prior work used multi-modal datasets for multi-task learning. However, the inter-modal commonalities, such as one across image, depth, and semantic labels, have not been fully exploited. We propose a multi-modal encoder-decoder networks to harness the multi-modal nature of multi-task scene recognition. In addition to the shared latent representation among encoder-decoder pairs, our model also has shared skip connections from different encoders. By combining these two representation sharing mechanisms, the proposed method efficiently learns a shared feature representation among all modalities in the training data. Experiments using two public datasets shows the advantage of our method over baseline methods that are based on encoder-decoder networks and multi-modal auto-encoders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iccvw.2017.54

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GNN-based methods model multimodal data through graph structures, enhancing global and robust semantic understanding.

    “GNN-based methods [52,53] model multimodal data through graph structures, enhancing global and robust semantic understanding.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuga, R., Kanezaki, A., Samejima, M., Sugano, Y., & Matsushita, Y.
Affiliations
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (JP)
Venue
2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-10
Pages
403-411
ISSN
2473-9936 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772409766
Cited by
36
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.12
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (publishedVersion)
  • Tokyo Tech Research Repository (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
Keywords
multi-task learning, shared latent representation, cross-modal learning, semantic segmentation, depth estimation, scene understanding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review