Cited by 737Image and Signal Denoising MethodsImage Enhancement TechniquesAdvanced Image Processing Techniques

Medical Image Denoising Using Convolutional Denoising Autoencoders

Open access
Gondara, Lovedeep·2016·2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)

Abstract

Image denoising is an important pre-processing step in medical image analysis. Different algorithms have been proposed in past three decades with varying denoising performances. More recently, having outperformed all conventional methods, deep learning based models have shown a great promise. These methods are however limited for requirement of large training sample size and high computational costs. In this paper we show that using small sample size, denoising autoencoders constructed using convolutional layers can be used for efficient denoising of medical images. Heterogeneous images can be combined to boost sample size for increased denoising performance. Simplest of networks can reconstruct images with corruption levels so high that noise and signal are not differentiable to human eye.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icdmw.2016.0041

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • New methods for preprocessing routines are arising, including deep learning based registration, skull stripping, and noise reduction.

    “At the same time, the new methods for these preprocessing routines are also arising, including deep learning based registration [23], skull stripping [24], and noise reduction [25].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [6][6] Coifman, Ronald R., and David L. Donoho. Translation-invariant denoising. Springer New York, 1995. -
  2. [21][21] Sanches, Joo M., Jacinto C. Nascimento, and Jorge S. Marques. 'Medical image noise reduction using the SylvesterLyapunov equation.' IEEE transactions on image processing 17.9 (2008): 1522-1539. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gondara, L.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Gondara, Lovedeep
Venue
2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-12
Pages
241-246
ISSN
2375-9259 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2510850936
Cited by
737
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 11
FWCI
9.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image Processing Techniques
Keywords
medical image denoising, convolutional denoising autoencoder, small training sample size, deep learning denoising, image reconstruction, noise reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review