Performance Comparison of PI, PID and Fuzzy Logic Controllers In Solid State Transformers for Wind Power Interfacing
Abstract
This paper focuses mainly on the performance comparison of different controllers for the Single Active Bridge based Solid State Transformer in the wind energy integration system. With less number of control switches and simple construction, the proposed system achieves voltage regulation under varying wind and load conditions. The PI, PID and fuzzy logic controllers are implemented for the high frequency transformer based DC-DC converter to achieve phase shift control. The results are compared, verified and analyzed using MATLAB/SIMULINK simulation platform.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The control requirement for the LV inverter is low and almost negligible compared to first-stage and second-stage control.
“The control requirement for this converter is low and almost negligible compared to the control part in the first-stage and second-stage [113].”
From State of the Art of Solid-State Transformers: Advanced Topologies, Implementation Issues, Recent Progress and Improvements (2020) · cites this paper as [113]
MMC requires more measurements than CHB and NPC, making it more costly and higher control complexity.
“Meanwhile, MMC requires not only these basic signals but also greater number of measurement than CHB and NPC such as the measurement of cell capacitor voltages, DC current, arm current, AC currents, and AC voltages [113]; resulting the MMC topology is more costly and higher control complexity, respectively.”
From State of the Art of Solid-State Transformers: Advanced Topologies, Implementation Issues, Recent Progress and Improvements (2020) · cites this paper as [113]
Cites
Design and Experimental Testing of a Resonant DC–DC Converter for Solid-State Transformers
Ortiz, G., Leibl, M. G., Huber, J. E., & Kolar, J. W. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2016.2637827 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Gao, R., She, X., Husain, I., & Huang, A. Q. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2017.2679679 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hannan, M. A., Ker, P. J., Lipu, M. S. H., Choi, Z. H., Rahman, M. S. A., Muttaqi, K. M., & Blaabjerg, F. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2967345 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
“(2018) demonstrated controller performance comparison [114] where a PWMsignal is generated by comparing the output voltage and the reference voltage using PI, PID or fuzzy logic controller.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Haritha, G., Kumaravel, S., & Ashok, S.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Technology Calicut (IN)
- ORCID
- Ashok, S
- Venue
- 2018 2nd International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-03
- Pages
- 188-192
- OpenAlex
- W2799817599
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wind Turbine Control Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › HVDC Systems and Fault Protection
- Keywords
- solid-state transformer, PI controller, PID controller, fuzzy logic controller, DC-DC converter, phase shift control, voltage regulation, wind power integration, controller performance comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
