Cited by 2Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesTopic ModelingMachine Learning in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Leveraging Foundation Models for Clinical Text Analysis

Open access
Raza, Shaina, Bashir, Syed Raza·2023·2023 IEEE 11th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)

Abstract

Infectious diseases are a significant public health concern globally, and extracting relevant information from scientific literature can facilitate the development of effective prevention and treatment strategies. However, the large amount of clinical data available presents a challenge for information extraction. To address this challenge, this study proposes a natural language processing (NLP) framework that uses a pre-trained transformer model fine-tuned on task-specific data to extract key information related to infectious diseases from free-text clinical data. The proposed framework includes a data layer for preparing datasets from clinical texts, a foundation model layer for entity extraction, and an assessment layer for performance analysis. The results of the evaluation indicate that the proposed method outperforms standard methods, and leveraging prior knowledge through the pre-trained transformer model makes it useful for investigating other infectious diseases in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ichi57859.2023.00103

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This includes constructing large foundation models for genomics, clinical images, and clinical text learning.

    “This includes constructing large foundation models for genomics [186], clinical images [187], and clinical text learning [188].”

    From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [188]

    The Introduction and Foundation model layer support the clinical-text portion: the paper uses a foundation model to extract information from clinical texts. But the Foundation model layer says it fine-tunes pre-trained BioBERT, not that it constructs a large foundation model. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1007/s11431-020-1647-3 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/978-3-030-56978-5_12 · DOI
  3. 10.1075/li.30.1.03nad · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.5772/51066 · DOI
  5. 10.1186/s12859-019-3321-4 · DOI
  6. Wang, 2019, A clinical text classification paradigm using weak supervision and deep representation 08 Information and Computing Sciences 0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences 1702 Cognitive Sciences, BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 19, 1, 10.1186/s12911-018-0723-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/978-3-030-68763-2_48 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz682 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.3389/fcell.2020.00673 · DOI
  10. Wu, Combine factual medical knowledge and distributed word representation to improve clinical named entity recognition, 2018, 1110
  11. 10.1186/s44247-023-00035-y · DOI
  12. Lituiev, 2022, Automatic Extraction of Social Determinants of Health from Medical Notes of Chronic Lower Back Pain Patients, medRxiv, 2022
  13. 10.1093/jamia/ocab170 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.3912/OJIN.Vol17No03Man04 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-94-024-0881-2_11 · DOI
  16. Sang, Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language-Independent Named Entity Recognition, 142
  17. 10.5772/51066 · DOI
  18. 10.1093/nar/gkaa952 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.006 · DOI
  20. 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000203 · DOI
  21. 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001628 · DOI
  22. 10.1162/tacl_a_00104 · DOI
  23. 10.1162/qss_a_00080 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0247461 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/s41467-022-30052-w · DOI
  26. 2012, Methods for De-identification of PHI, HHS.gov

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Raza, S., & Bashir, S. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Venue
2023 IEEE 11th International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-06-26
Pages
575-580
OpenAlex
W4389577465
Cited by
2
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
infectious diseases, clinical text mining, information extraction, named entity recognition, pre-trained transformer models, fine-tuning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review