Cited by 99Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlEmotion and Mood Recognition

Remote PPG based vital sign measurement using adaptive facial regions

Tasli, H. Emrah, Gudi, Amogh, den Uyl, Marten·2014·2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)

Abstract

This paper proposes a remote photoplethysmography measurement technique where human skin color variations are analysed for observing human vital signs including but not limited to average heart rate and variation. Remote monitoring of the vital signs could be useful for non-contact physiological and psychological diagnosis. For this purpose, an off-the-self non-invasive video camera is used. Facial appearance modelling is performed for stabilizing color variations in the selected facial region during the signal acquisition stage. The proposed method offers a novel signal processing approach for extracting the periodic component of the raw color signal for the heart rate and variation estimation. To this end, we have collected a ground truth dataset using a PPG instrument attached to the skin of the subject under observation. Objective performance tests show strong correlation with the ground truth values for the estimated heart rate and variation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icip.2014.7025282

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As the sensor directly depends on reflectance properties of the skin tissue, different skin colors may change the overall signal quality of the recorded PPG data.

    “As the sensor directly depends on reflectance properties of the skin tissue, different skin colors may change the overall signal quality of the recorded PPG data49,50.”

    From Data quality evaluation in wearable monitoring (2022) · cites this paper as [49]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tasli, H. E., Gudi, A., & den Uyl, M.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2014-10
Pages
1410-1414
ISSN
1522-4880 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039948765
Cited by
99
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
16.18
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
remote photoplethysmography, vital signs monitoring, heart rate estimation, heart rate variability, skin color variation, non-contact physiological monitoring, periodic signal extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review