The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Explainable Hybrid Model for Bankruptcy Prediction Based on the Decision Tree and Deep Neural Network
Abstract
For investors seeking solutions to optimize their portfolio of assets to generate profits and minimize losses, choosing a sophisticated model to evaluate the risk of corporate financial distress will be crucial to support their asset management and investment decisions. Both the machine learning and the newly developed deep learning techniques have been employed to construct bankruptcy prediction models for decades. However, applying the deep learning models might increase the predictive accuracy in exchange for losing model interpretability, because the structure and parameters of the model are not easy to provide accountability for investors. In this study, a hybrid approach integrating the decision tree with the deep neural network was proposed to provide a compromise solution for investors. The decision tree was adopted as the primary model to provide explainable ability, while the deep neural network was chosen to improve predictive accuracy. The decision fusion of two models was designed with the compensatory and non-compensatory approaches. The hybrid model was implemented by concatenating the deep neural network to the selected branches of decision tree that perform poor predictive accuracy during model training. The empirical results showed that the predictive accuracy of the deep neural network and the decision tree were 80% and 87% respectively, and the overall accuracy was improved to 91% by the hybrid model.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Related studies (e.g., Arrieta et al. 2019; Chou 2019) confirm decision trees to be well-employed in XAI research”
From Applications of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Finance—a systematic review of Finance, Information Systems, and Computer Science literature (2024) · cites this paper as Chou 2019
Citations
Cites
Toward Human-Understandable, Explainable AI
Hagras, H. (2018) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2018.3620965 · Cited by 350
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TNNLS.2018.2869694 · DOI
- 10.1109/PAC.2018.00013 · DOI
- 10.18653/v1/N16-3020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICTEmSys.2017.7958771 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICISC.2018.8399072 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
Weber, P., Carl, K. V., & Hinz, O. (2024) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-023-00320-0 · Cited by 292
“Related studies (e.g., Arrieta et al. 2019; Chou 2019) confirm decision trees to be well-employed in XAI research, but we find a different picture regarding general additive models.”
Nasarian, E., Alizadehsani, R., Acharya, U. R., & Tsui, K.-L. (2024) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102412 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, T.-N.
- Affiliations
- Chaoyang University of Technology (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Chou, Tsung-Nan
- ORCID
- Chou, Tsung-Nan
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-07
- Pages
- 122-125
- OpenAlex
- W3013359911
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Innovation and Invention (ICKII) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Stock Market Forecasting Methods
- Keywords
- bankruptcy prediction, corporate financial distress, explainable machine learning, model interpretability, decision fusion, investment risk assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review