Cited by 93Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace and Expression Recognition

Deep Neural Networks with Relativity Learning for facial expression recognition

Yanan Guo, Dapeng Tao, Jun Yu, Hao Xiong, Yaotang Li, Dacheng Tao·2016·2016 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW)

Abstract

Facial expression recognition aims to classify facial expression as one of seven basic emotions including “neutral”. This is a difficult problem due to the complexity and subtlety of human facial expressions, but the technique is needed in important applications such as social interaction research. Deep learning methods have achieved state-of-the-art performance in many tasks including face recognition and person re-identification. Here we present a deep learning method termed Deep Neural Networks with Relativity Learning (DNNRL), which directly learns a mapping from original images to a Euclidean space, where relative distances correspond to a measure of facial expression similarity. DNNRL updates the model parameters according to sample importance. This strategy results in an adjustable and robust model. Experiments on two representative facial expression datasets (FER-2013 and SFEW 2.0) are performed to demonstrate the robustness and effectiveness of DNNRL.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icmew.2016.7574736

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data augmentation artificially increases the number of available examples or training epochs by a factor typically between 10 and 30, and up to 300.

    “This way, researchers artificially increase the number of available examples or training epochs by a factor typically between 10 and 30 [88], [113], [114], and up to 300 [115].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, Y., Tao, D., Yu, J., Xiong, H., Li, Y., & Tao, D.
Affiliations
  • Yunnan University (CN)
  • Hangzhou Dianzi University (CN)
Venue
2016 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2016-07
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2527430601
Cited by
93
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.87
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Multimedia & Expo Workshops (ICMEW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, basic emotions, deep neural network, sample importance, FER2013, model robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review