Cited by 208Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsSpinal Cord Injury ResearchStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differentiating ability in users of the ReWalkTM powered exoskeleton: An analysis of walking kinematics

Talaty, Mukul, Esquenazi, Alberto, Briceno, Jorge E.·2013·2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)

Abstract

The ReWalk(TM) powered exoskeleton assists thoracic level motor complete spinal cord injury patients who are paralyzed to walk again with an independent, functional, upright, reciprocating gait. We completed an evaluation of twelve such individuals with promising results. All subjects met basic criteria to be able to use the ReWalk(TM)--including items such as sufficient bone mineral density, leg passive range of motion, strength, body size and weight limits. All subjects received approximately the same number of training sessions. However there was a wide distribution in walking ability. Walking velocities ranged from under 0.1m/s to approximately 0.5m/s. This variability was not completely explained by injury level The remaining sources of that variability are not clear at present. This paper reports our preliminary analysis into how the walking kinematics differed across the subjects--as a first step to understand the possible contribution to the velocity range and determine if the subjects who did not walk as well could be taught to improve by mimicking the better walkers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icorr.2013.6650469

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ReWalk exoskeleton provides powered hip and knee motion to enable individuals with SCI to stand upright and walk.

    “The ReWalk exoskeleton developed by ReWalk Robotics (Marlborough, MA, USA; Figure 2A) is a LEEs that provides powered hip and knee motion to enable individuals with SCI to stand upright and walk [32], [33].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. esquenazi, 2002, Normal and pathological gait analysis, Physical Medicine &Rehabilitation The Complete Approach 2000
  2. chafetz, 2008, Lower limb orthoses for persons with spinal cord injuriy, AAOS Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices
  3. 0, Resources for Entertainment Education Content Developers

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Talaty, M., Esquenazi, A., & Briceno, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Moss Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
  • Universidad Simón Bolívar (VE)
Venue
2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2013-06
Volume
2013
Pages
1-5
ISSN
1945-7898 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123950545
Cited by
207
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 5
FWCI
19.82
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
spinal cord injury, gait kinematics, walking speed, gait training, gait imitation, assistive robotics
MeSH terms
Ankle Joint, Biomechanical Phenomena, Hip Joint, Humans, Robotics, Spinal Cord Injuries, Task Performance and Analysis, Range of Motion, Articular, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review