The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long Short-Term Memory Network for Remaining Useful Life estimation
Abstract
Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or a system is defined as the length from the current time to the end of the useful life. Accurate RUL estimation plays a critical role in Prognostics and Health Management(PHM). Data driven approaches for RUL estimation use sensor data and operational data to estimate RUL. Traditional regression based approaches and recent Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) approach use features created from sliding windows to build models. However, sequence information is not fully considered in these approaches. Sequence learning models such as Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) have flaws when modeling sequence information. HMMs are limited to discrete hidden states and are known to have issues when modeling long-term dependencies in the data. RNNs also have issues with long-term dependencies. In this work, we propose a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) approach for RUL estimation, which can make full use of the sensor sequence information and expose hidden patterns within sensor data with multiple operating conditions, fault and degradation models. Extensive experiments using three widely adopted Prognostics and Health Management data sets show that LSTM for RUL estimation significantly outperforms traditional approaches for RUL estimation as well as Convolutional Neural Network (CNN).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Graves, A., Wayne, G., & Danihelka, I. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1410.5401 · Cited by 1,058
Cited by
A review on the application of deep learning in system health management
Khan, S., & Yairi, T. (2018) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.024 · Cited by 1,133
Listou Ellefsen, A., Bjørlykhaug, E., Æsøy, V., Ushakov, S., & Zhang, H. (2019) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.027 · Cited by 523
Ferreira, C., & Gonçalves, G. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.05.010 · Cited by 417
Elahi, M., Afolaranmi, S. O., Martinez Lastra, J. L., & Perez Garcia, J. A. (2023) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00089-x · Cited by 303
Miao, H., Li, B., Sun, C., & Liu, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2900295 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Zheng, S., Ristovski, K., Farahat, A., & Gupta, C.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-06
- Pages
- 88-95
- OpenAlex
- W2744067593
- Cited by
- 882
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 77.73
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long Short-Term Memory Network for Remaining Useful Life estimation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icphm.2017.7998311
- The paper
- Zheng, S., Ristovski, K., Farahat, A., & Gupta, C. (2017). Long Short-Term Memory Network for Remaining Useful Life estimation. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM). https://doi.org/10.1109/icphm.2017.7998311
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.