The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The gait identification challenge problem: data sets and baseline algorithm
Abstract
Recognition of people through gait analysis is an important research topic, with potential applications in video surveillance, tracking, and monitoring. Recognizing the importance of evaluating and comparing possible competing solutions to this problem, we previously introduced the HumanID challenge problem consisting of a set of experiments of increasing difficulty, a baseline algorithm, and a large set of video sequences (about 300 GB of data related to 452 sequences from 74 subjects) acquired to investigate important dimensions to this problem, such as variations due to viewpoint, footwear and walking surface. In this paper we present a detailed investigation of the baseline algorithm, quantify the dependence of the various covariates on gait-based identification, and update the previous baseline performance with optimized ones. We establish that the performance of the baseline algorithm is robust with respect to its various parameters. The overall identification performance is also stable with respect to the quality of the silhouettes. We find that the approximately lower 20% of the silhouette accounts for most of the recognition achieved. Viewpoint has barely statistically significant effect on identification rates, whereas footwear and surface-type does have significant effects with the effect due to surface-type being approximately 5 times that of shoe-type.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The humanID gait challenge problem: data sets, performance, and analysis
Sarkar, S., Phillips, P. J., Liu, Z., Vega, I. R., Grother, P., & Bowyer, K. W. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.39 · Cited by 1,133
Self-citationTracking multiple humans in complex situations
Zhao, T., & Nevatia, R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.73 · Cited by 490
Fusion of Static and Dynamic Body Biometrics for Gait Recognition
Wang, L., Ning, H., Tan, T., & Hu, W. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2003.821972 · Cited by 377
Gait Components and Their Application to Gender Recognition
Li, X., Maybank, S. J., Yan, S., Tao, D., & Xu, D. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.2007.913886 · Cited by 300
Advances in automatic gait recognition
Nixon, M. S., & Carter, J. N. (2004) · Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2004. Proceedings. · doi:10.1109/afgr.2004.1301521 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, P. J., Sarkar, S., Robledo, I., Grother, P., & Bowyer, K.
- Venue
- Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-06-25
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 385-388
- OpenAlex
- W2149536289
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The gait identification challenge problem: data sets and baseline algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icpr.2002.1044731
- The paper
- Phillips, P. J., Sarkar, S., Robledo, I., Grother, P., & Bowyer, K. (2003). The gait identification challenge problem: data sets and baseline algorithm. Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots. https://doi.org/10.1109/icpr.2002.1044731
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.