Cited by 19Video Analysis and SummarizationAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods

Attention-Based Deep Metric Learning for Near-Duplicate Video Retrieval

Wang, Kuan-Hsun, Cheng, Chia-Chun, Chen, Yi-Ling, Song, Yale, Lai, Shang-Hong·2021·2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)

Abstract

Near-duplicate video retrieval (NDVR) is an important and challenging problem due to the increasing amount of videos uploaded to the Internet. In this paper, we propose an attention-based deep metric learning method for NDVR. Our method is based on well-established principles: We leverage two-stream networks to combine RGB and optical flow features, and incorporate an attention module to effectively deal with distractor frames commonly observed in near duplicate videos. We further aggregate the features corresponding to multiple video segments to enhance the discriminative power. The whole system is trained using a deep metric learning objective with a Siamese architecture. Our experiments show that the attention module helps eliminate redundant and noisy frames, while focusing on visually relevant frames for solving NVDR. We evaluate our approach on recent large-scale NDVR datasets, CC_WEB_VIDEO, VCDB, FIVR and SVD. To demonstrate the generalization ability of our approach, we report results in both within- and cross-dataset settings, and show that the proposed method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art approaches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412710

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed scheme achieves superior copy detection performance compared with existing schemes.

    “Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed scheme achieves superior performance of copy detection compared with existing schemes and performs well even in the case of untrained manipulations.”
  • The proposed scheme achieves the best overall performance with respect to perceptual robustness and discrimination among the compared schemes.

    “As shown in Fig. 5, the ROC curve of our scheme is the closest to the upper left corner, which means our scheme achieves the best overall performance with respect to perceptual robustness and discrimination.”
  • For most manipulations, the F1 scores of the proposed scheme are greater than those of the other compared schemes.

    “We can find that, for most manipulations, the 𝐹 1 scores of our scheme are greater than those of other compared schemes.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, K.-H., Cheng, C.-C., Chen, Y.-L., Song, Y., & Lai, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • National Tsing Hua University (TW)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Venue
2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-01-10
Pages
5360-5367
ISSN
1041-3278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3126370457
Cited by
19
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
FWCI
1.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Keywords
near-duplicate video retrieval, attention mechanism, deep metric learning, two-stream network, Siamese network, cross-dataset generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review