Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

AMSwarm: An Alternating Minimization Approach for Safe Motion Planning of Quadrotor Swarms in Cluttered Environments

Adajania, Vivek K., Zhou, Siqi, Singh, Arun Kumar, Schoellig, Angela P.·2023·2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)

Abstract

This paper presents a scalable online algorithm to generate safe and kinematically feasible trajectories for quadrotor swarms. Existing approaches rely on linearizing Euclidean distance-based collision constraints and on axis-wise decoupling of kinematic constraints to reduce the trajectory optimization problem for each quadrotor to a quadratic program (QP). This conservative approximation often fails to find a solution in cluttered environments. We present a novel alternative that handles collision constraints without linearization and kinematic constraints in their quadratic form while still retaining the QP form. We achieve this by reformulating the constraints in a polar form and applying an Alternating Minimization algorithm to the resulting problem. Through extensive simulation results, we demonstrate that, as compared to Sequential Convex Programming (SCP) baselines, our approach achieves on average, a 72% improvement in success rate, a 36% reduction in mission time, and a 42 times faster per-agent computation time. We also show that collision constraints derived from discrete-time barrier functions (BF) can be incorporated, leading to different safety behaviours without significant computational overhead. Moreover, our optimizer outperforms the state-of-the-art optimal control solver ACADO in handling BF constraints with a 31 times faster per-agent computation time and a 44% reduction in mission time on average. We experimentally validated our approach on a Crazyflie quadrotor swarm of up to 12 quadrotors. The code with supplementary material and video are released for reference.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161063

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Scene 3: Shared Workspace with Human
Scene 3: Shared Workspace with HumanCC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 3 Average performance comparison of our approach in point-topoint transition setting with different values of γ in the barrier function constraints. The environment is of 32 m 3 in volume and has 16 static obstacles. For each swarm size, 100 configurations were executed.
Fig. 3 Average performance comparison of our approach in point-topoint transition setting with different values of γ in the barrier function constraints. The environment is of 32 m 3 in volume and has 16 static obstacles. For each swarm size, 100 configurations were executed.CC-BY · From the PDF
Fig. 4 Performance comparison of our approach and ACADO with BF constraints ( γ = 0 . 9 ) in antipodal position exchange scenario with no static obstacles. ACADO could accomodate only a maximum of 8 agents.
Fig. 4 Performance comparison of our approach and ACADO with BF constraints ( γ = 0 . 9 ) in antipodal position exchange scenario with no static obstacles. ACADO could accomodate only a maximum of 8 agents.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. taylor, 0, Training neural networks without gradients: A scalable admm approach, Proc of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2722
  2. adajania, 2022, AM-Swarm

Cited by

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Adajania, V. K., Zhou, S., Singh, A. K., & Schoellig, A. P.
Venue
2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-05-29
Pages
1421-1427
Cited by
23
References
27

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AMSwarm: An Alternating Minimization Approach for Safe Motion Planning of Quadrotor Swarms in Cluttered Environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161063
The paper
Adajania, V. K., Zhou, S., Singh, A. K., & Schoellig, A. P. (2023). AMSwarm: An Alternating Minimization Approach for Safe Motion Planning of Quadrotor Swarms in Cluttered Environments. 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). https://doi.org/10.1109/icra48891.2023.10161063

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.