The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Security and privacy requirements analysis within a social setting
Abstract
Security issues for software systems ultimately concern relationships among social actors stakeholders, system users, potential attackers - and the software acting on their behalf. We propose a methodological framework for dealing with security and privacy requirements based on i*, an agent-oriented requirements modeling language. The framework supports a set of analysis techniques. In particular, attacker analysis helps identify potential system abusers and their malicious intents. Dependency vulnerability analysis helps detect vulnerabilities in terms of organizational relationships among stakeholders. Countermeasure analysis supports the dynamic decision-making process of defensive system players in addressing vulnerabilities and threats. Finally, access control analysis bridges the gap between security requirement models and security implementation models. The framework is illustrated with an example involving security and privacy concerns in the design of agent-based health information systems. In addition, we discuss model evaluation techniques, including qualitative goal model analysis and property verification techniques based on model checking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Role-based access control models
Sandhu, R. S., Coyne, E. J., Feinstein, H. L., & Youman, C. E. (1996) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.485845 · Cited by 5,892
On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering
Chung, L., & do Prado Leite, J. C. S. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_19 · Cited by 2,247
Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering
Chung, L., Nixon, B. A., Yu, E., & Mylopoulos, J. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5269-7 · Cited by 1,690
Self-citationSafeware: System Safety and Computers
Leveson, N. G. (1995) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,688
Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering
Yu, E. S. K. (2002) · Proceedings of ISRE '97: 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1109/isre.1997.566873 · Cited by 1,579
Self-citationAlloy: a lightweight object modelling notation
Jackson, D. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/505145.505149 · Cited by 1,181
Telos: representing knowledge about information systems
Mylopoulos, J., Borgida, A., Jarke, M., & Koubarakis, M. (1990) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/102675.102676 · Cited by 786
Self-citationHandling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering
van Lamsweerde, A., & Letier, E. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/32.879820 · Cited by 648
Attack trees : Modeling security threats
Schneier, B. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 635
Using abuse case models for security requirements analysis
McDermott, J. P., & Fox, C. (2003) · Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1109/csac.1999.816013 · Cited by 398
Cited by
On Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering
Chung, L., & do Prado Leite, J. C. S. (2009) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02463-4_19 · Cited by 2,247
Eliciting security requirements with misuse cases
Sindre, G., & Opdahl, A. L. (2005) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-004-0194-4 · Cited by 730
Security Requirements Engineering: A Framework for Representation and Analysis
Haley, C. B., Laney, R., Moffett, J. D., & Nuseibeh, B. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2007.70754 · Cited by 462
Towards Achieving Data Security with the Cloud Computing Adoption Framework
Chang, V., & Ramachandran, M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2015.2491281 · Cited by 286
A comparison of security requirements engineering methods
Fabian, B., Gürses, S., Heisel, M., Santen, T., & Schmidt, H. (2010) · Requirements Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00766-009-0092-x · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, L., Yu, E., & Mylopoulos, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Lightwave Technology
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2004-04-23
- Pages
- 151-161
- ISSN
- 0733-8724 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110157102
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 44.75
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Security and privacy requirements analysis within a social setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icre.2003.1232746
- The paper
- Liu, L., Yu, E., & Mylopoulos, J. (2004). Security and privacy requirements analysis within a social setting. Journal of Lightwave Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/icre.2003.1232746
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
