Cited by 17Web Application Security VulnerabilitiesSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Testing and Debugging Techniques

A Unified Framework for Automating Software Security Analysis in DevSecOps

Aljohani, Mohammad A., Alqahtani, Sultan S.·2023·2023 International Conference on Smart Computing and Application (ICSCA)

Abstract

The Development and Operations (DevOps) methodology is a set of practices and cultural values. Its main objectives are to shorten the software development lifecycle, produce quality software, and eliminate software evolution barriers. The increased demand for secure software applications has led to a new field version of DevOps called Development, Security, and Operations (DevSecOps), which attempts to integrate security practices into the DevOps process. In this paper, we outline the current challenges in securing DevOps applications, such as the lack of automated software security testing tools, insufficient integration of security tools, a lack of security knowledge between developers, and false-positive results produced by many vulnerability scanner tools. Therefore, we introduce a unified framework for automating software security analysis in the DevSecOps paradigm that serves as a middle development process between software applications' Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Delivery (CD) pipelines and application security services. We have shown the framework's high-level architecture, and one case study is presented to illustrate the applicability of our proposed approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsca57840.2023.10087568

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limitations remain due to the heterogeneity and variable quality of included studies, potential publication bias, and the ongoing evolution of technologies, which may render some insights rapidly outdated.

    “However, limitations remain due to the heterogeneity and variable quality of included studies, potential publication bias, and the ongoing evolution of technologies, which may render some insights rapidly outdated and highlight the need for continued empirical research and validation in diverse organisational contexts [26,27].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aljohani, M. A., & Alqahtani, S. S.
Affiliations
Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA)
Venue
2023 International Conference on Smart Computing and Application (ICSCA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-02-05
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W4362647473
Cited by
17
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Smart Computing and Application (ICSCA) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Keywords
DevSecOps, software security analysis, automated security testing, vulnerability scanners, false positives, continuous integration, continuous delivery, security tool integration, secure software development, unified framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review