Cited by 97Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesWeb Application Security VulnerabilitiesInformation and Cyber Security

Modeling continuous security: A conceptual model for automated DevSecOps using open-source software over cloud (ADOC)

Kumar, Rakesh, Goyal, Rinkaj·2020·Computers & Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2020.101967

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 101 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, R., & Goyal, R.
Affiliations
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University (IN)
Corresponding author
Goyal, Rinkaj
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
97
Pages
101967
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3042680674
Cited by
97
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
DevSecOps, open source software, cloud computing, security assurance, agile software development, security metrics, data security and privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review