Cited by 52Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningSpeech and dialogue systemsAI in Service Interactions

“A review on techniques, characteristics and approaches of an intelligent tutoring chatbot system,”

Ashfaque, Mohammed Waseem, Tharewal, Sumegh, Iqhbal, Sohail, Kayte, Charansing N.·2020·2020 International Conference on Smart Innovations in Design, Environment, Management, Planning and Computing (ICSIDEMPC)

Abstract

Today is the age of Advancement in the various types of machines or devices. And due to this advance. Attribute the difference between human and machine decrease. And the technology, of the computer-based learning system, are integrating more towards Advance tools and technologies like (A.I, N.L.P.)”, such a system is known as an intelligent-tutoring system or conversation system, like a chatbot. It is necessary that with rapidly changing technology, teaching and learning methods of the education system should adapt to increase and enhance the capabilities of teachers and abilities of the students. Therefore, the intelligent tutoring system (Chatbot) using natural language which allows humans to interact with a computer is one of the best alternatives of these requirements where the human tutor is replacing with a virtual tutor. Nowadays, an intelligent tutoring system(Chatbots) are in high demands in our various fields like teaching and learning in education, business, e-comm, online trading, public health care, and sports etc. Different techniques and processes are involved in designing and developing chatbots. This review paper aims to take a survey of the critical and necessary methods used in this communication and conversational agents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsidempc49020.2020.9299583

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Presently, a significant number of frameworks in interactive tutoring aids use chatbots as a proxy for a teacher or a teaching assistant.

    “Presently, a significant number of frameworks belonging to this category uses chatbots as a proxy for a teacher or a teaching assistant (Ashfaque et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashfaque, M. W., Tharewal, S., Iqhbal, S., & Kayte, C. N.
Affiliations
  • Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University (IN)
  • Al-Buraimi University College (OM)
  • Government Institute of Forensic Science (IN)
Venue
2020 International Conference on Smart Innovations in Design, Environment, Management, Planning and Computing (ICSIDEMPC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-10-30
Pages
258-262
OpenAlex
W3121078114
Cited by
52
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Smart Innovations in Design, Environment, Management, Planning and Computing (ICSIDEMPC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, chatbots, virtual tutors, natural language processing, human-computer interaction, computer-assisted instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review