Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 373

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy

Yanco, H.A., Drury, J.·2005·2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583)

Abstract

This paper extends taxonomy of human-robot interaction (HRI) introduced in 2002 to include additional categories as well as updates to the categories from the original taxonomy. New classifications include measures of the social nature of the task (human interaction roles and human-robot physical proximity), task type, and robot morphology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/icsmc.2004.1400763

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 373

Metadata

Authors
Yanco, H. A., & Drury, J.
Venue
2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2005-03-31
Volume
3
Pages
2841-2846
ISSN
1062-922X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2097544529
Cited by
373
References
1
FWCI
15.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/icsmc.2004.1400763
The paper
Yanco, H. A., & Drury, J. (2005). Classifying human-robot interaction: an updated taxonomy. 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37583). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.2004.1400763

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.