The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determining the number of clusters/segments in hierarchical clustering/segmentation algorithms
Abstract
Many clustering and segmentation algorithms both suffer from the limitation that the number of clusters/segments is specified by a human user. It is often impractical to expect a human with sufficient domain knowledge to be available to select the number of clusters/segments to return. We investigate techniques to determine the number of clusters or segments to return from hierarchical clustering and segmentation algorithms. We propose an efficient algorithm, the L method that finds the "knee" in a '# of clusters vs. clustering evaluation metric' graph. Using the knee is well-known, but is not a particularly well-understood method to determine the number of clusters. We explore the feasibility of this method, and attempt to determine in which situations it will and will not work. We also compare the L method to existing methods based on the accuracy of the number of clusters that are determined and efficiency. Our results show favorable performance for these criteria compared to the existing methods that were evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., & Hastie, T. (2001) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00293 · Cited by 6,205
Monti, S., Tamayo, P., Mesirov, J., & Golub, T. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1023949509487 · Cited by 2,116
BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases
Zhang, T., Ramakrishnan, R., & Livny, M. (1996) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/235968.233324 · Cited by 2,097
An online algorithm for segmenting time series
Keogh, E., Chu, S., Hart, D., & Pazzani, M. (2002) · Proceedings 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · doi:10.1109/icdm.2001.989531 · Cited by 1,149
Cited by
A network approach for identifying and delimiting biogeographical regions
Vilhena, D. A., & Antonelli, A. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7848 · Cited by 257
Mansbach, R. A., & Ferguson, A. L. (2015) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4914144 · Cited by 39
Dynamically Adaptive Genetic Algorithm to Select Training Data for SVMs
Kawulok, M., & Nalepa, J. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12027-0_20 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Salvador, S., & Chan, P.
- Venue
- 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2005-02-22
- Pages
- 576-584
- ISSN
- 1082-3409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098515641
- Cited by
- 683
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determining the number of clusters/segments in hierarchical clustering/segmentation algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/ictai.2004.50
- The paper
- Salvador, S., & Chan, P. (2005). Determining the number of clusters/segments in hierarchical clustering/segmentation algorithms. 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2004.50
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.