A Natural Language Processing Tool to Support the Electronic Invoicing Process in Italy
Abstract
The use of electronic invoices helps to reduce the amount of paper used to store transaction information and offers many benefits to the companies. Indeed, it allows to speed the process, improve the efficiency, and reduce the environmental externalities. In addition, the availability of real-data on business operations ensures the timely detection of fraudulent transactions. However, the electronic invoicing process requires that all the invoices are converted to a standard electronic format, specified by local governments. In this work, we present a software tool developed to support the invoice dematerialization process in Italy. The implemented system is based on the named entity recognition model, a natural language processing technique capable of identifying the structure of the documents and automatically extrapolating the information. The developed tool has been tested by an Italian company. The results obtained are encouraging.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI systems might be applied for aims outside the legitimate scope for which they were introduced.
“they may be used for purposes beyond the legitimate scope that motivated their introduction, 10”
From Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data
Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., & Pereira, F. C. N. (2001) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 12,953 · see citing works
Chowdhary, K. R. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-3972-7_19 · Cited by 1,211 · see citing works
A comparison of algorithms for maximum entropy parameter estimation
Malouf, R. (2002) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.3115/1118853.1118871 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
(2004) · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Integer linear programming inference for conditional random fields
Roth, D., & Yih, W.-T. (2005) · International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1102351.1102444 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Mohit, B. (2014) · Theory and applications of natural language processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45358-8_7 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
A survey of resource constrained shortest path problems: Exact solution approaches
Pugliese, L. D. P., & Guerriero, F. (2013) · Networks · doi:10.1002/net.21511 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Self-citationStudy and Reports on the VAT Gap in the EU-28 Member States: 2020 Final ReportPreprint
Poniatowski, G., Śmietanka, A., & Bonch-Osmolovskiy, M. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3744157 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Soft-constrained inference for Named Entity Recognition
Fersini, E., Messina, E., Felici, G., & Roth, D. (2014) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2014.04.005 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationNamed Entity Recognition: Resource Constrained Maximum Path
Pugliese, L. D. P., Fersini, E., Guerriero, F., et al. (2017) · ITM Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/itmconf/20171400004 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard
Kuźniacki, B., Almada, M., Tyliński, K., Górski, L., Winogradska, B., & Zeldenrust, R. (2022) · World Tax Journal · doi:10.59403/2yhh9pa · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Requirements for Tax XAI Under Constitutional Principles and Human Rights
Kuzniacki, B., Almada, M., Tyliński, K., & Górski, Ł. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15565-9_14 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Di Puglia Pugliese, L., Guerriero, F., Macrina, G., & Messina, E.
- Affiliations
- Istituto di Calcolo e Reti ad Alte Prestazioni, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche,Rende,Italy
- University of Calabria (IT)
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
- Venue
- 2021 11th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-09-22
- Pages
- 397-402
- OpenAlex
- W4206089556
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: Technology and Applications (IDAACS) (publishedVersion)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- electronic invoicing, named entity recognition, document structure recognition, fraud detection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review