Cited by 10Information and Cyber SecurityNetwork Security and Intrusion DetectionPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Towards an Explainable Approach for Insider Threat Detection: Constraint Network Learning

Orizio, Riccardo, Vuppala, Satyanarayana, Basagiannis, Stylianos, Provan, Gregory·2020·2020 International Conference on Intelligent Data Science Technologies and Applications (IDSTA)

Abstract

Insider threats are considered a major threat to information and communication technology (ICT) systems creating an important source of vulnerabilities from a security perspective. The technical knowledge that insiders have about the ICT systems, such as its IT infrastructure, the high load of data generated by other employees of the company which hides insiders' activities, their access rights as well as the confidentiality of the data of which they have access to, creates the perfect scenario for a powerful yet undetected attack. State of the art techniques and security operations center tools struggle to come up with effective solutions to recognise these threats. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a novel artificial intelligence based constraint learning technique to help their detection. The approach creates an optimized constraint network representing the nominal behaviour of an employee and detects threatening events when their associated costs are above a certain threshold. The threshold is learnt alongside with the constraint network model. The proposed approach is based on detection models able to provide human interpretable feedback regarding the detection performed. These information are crucial in helping system operators to understand why the detection has occurred and to help them acting promptly on the threat. The explanation comes directly from the structure of the detection model and relies on the identification of which constraints are being violated. The approach is tested on the CERT insider threat dataset v4.2 and the results obtained look promising, achieving at least the same accuracy as other state of the art techniques as well as providing the details regarding the broken constraints of the threat. A comparison with state of the art techniques applied on this dataset is also provided, showing the strength of our results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/idsta50958.2020.9264049

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Orizio, R., Vuppala, S., Basagiannis, S., & Provan, G.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • United Technologies Research Center (IE)
Venue
2020 International Conference on Intelligent Data Science Technologies and Applications (IDSTA)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-10-19
Pages
42-49
OpenAlex
W3107392334
Cited by
10
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Intelligent Data Science Technologies and Applications (IDSTA) (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme InfraStress (833088)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Keywords
insider threat detection, explainable AI, constraint violation, threshold learning, CERT insider threat dataset, security operations center

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review