Cited by 314Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesNeural Networks and Reservoir Computing

Phase change memory as synapse for ultra-dense neuromorphic systems: Application to complex visual pattern extraction

Open access
Suri, Manan, Bichler, Olivier, Querlioz, Damien, Cueto, Olga, Perniola, Luca, Sousa, Veronique, Vuillaume, Dominique, Gamrat, Christian +1 more·2011·2011 International Electron Devices Meeting

Abstract

We demonstrate a unique energy efficient methodology to use Phase Change Memory (PCM) as synapse in ultra-dense large scale neuromorphic systems. PCM devices with different chalcogenide materials were characterized to demonstrate synaptic behavior. Multi-physical simulations were used to interpret the results. We propose special circuit architecture (“the 2-PCM synapse”), read, write, and reset programming schemes suitable for the use of PCM in neural networks. A versatile behavioral model of PCM which can be used for simulating large scale neural systems is introduced. First demonstration of complex visual pattern extraction from real world data using PCM synapses in a 2-layer spiking neural network (SNN) is shown. System power analysis for different scaled PCM technologies is also provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/iedm.2011.6131488

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A non-differential architecture would have a lower implementation complexity than its differential counterpart because the refresh operation can be completely avoided.

    “A non-differential architecture would have a lower implementation complexity than its differential counterpart because the refresh operation34,37, which requires reading and reprogramming G+ and G−, can be completely avoided.”

    From Neuromorphic computing with multi-memristive synapses (2018) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suri, M., Bichler, O., Querlioz, D., Cueto, O., Perniola, L., Sousa, V., Vuillaume, D., Gamrat, C., & DeSalvo, B.
Affiliations
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
2011 International Electron Devices Meeting
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2011-12
Pages
4.4.1-4.4.4
ISSN
0163-1918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991059746
Cited by
314
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Technical digest - International Electron Devices Meeting/Technical digest (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Phase-change materials and chalcogenides
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Keywords
phase-change memory, neuromorphic hardware, chalcogenide materials, synaptic behavior, spiking neural networks, energy efficiency, power analysis, multiphysics simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review