Cited by 20Advanced Memory and Neural ComputingFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance DevicesPhase-change materials and chalcogenides

Stochastic weight updates in phase-change memory-based synapses and their influence on artificial neural networks

Boybat, Irem, Le Gallo, Manuel, Moraitis, Timoleon, Leblebici, Yusuf, Sebastian, Abu, Eleftheriou, Evangelos·2017·2017 13th Conference on Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME)

Abstract

Artificial neural networks (ANN) have become a powerful tool for machine learning. Resistive memory devices can be used for the realization of a non-von Neumann computational platform for ANN training in an area-efficient way. For instance, the conductance values of phase-change memory (PCM) devices can be used to represent synaptic weights and can be updated in-situ according to learning rules. However, non-ideal device characteristics pose challenges to reach competitive classification accuracies. In this paper, we investigate the impact of granularity and stochasticity associated with the conductance changes on ANN performance. Using a PCM prototype chip fabricated in the 90 nm technology node, we present a detailed experimental characterization of the conductance changes. Simulations are done in order to quantify the effect of the experimentally observed conductance change granularity and stochasticity on classification accuracies in a fully connected ANN trained with backpropagation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/prime.2017.7974095

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large conductance change granularities and nonlinear conductance responses observed in PCM characterization degrade the performance of neural networks trained with memristive synapses.

    “Large conductance change granularities, as well as nonlinear conductance responses, both observed in the PCM characterization performed here, have been shown to degrade the performance of neural networks trained with memristive synapses34,43.”

    From Neuromorphic computing with multi-memristive synapses (2018) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boybat, I., Le Gallo, M., Moraitis, T., Leblebici, Y., Sebastian, A., & Eleftheriou, E.
Affiliations
  • IBM Research - Zurich (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Venue
2017 13th Conference on Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-06
Pages
13-16
OpenAlex
W2734907865
Cited by
20
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.03
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Conference on Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Phase-change materials and chalcogenides
Keywords
phase-change memory, resistive memory devices, synaptic weights, conductance change, randomness, granularity, artificial neural networks, non-von Neumann computing, backpropagation training, classification accuracy, device characterization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review