Communication Protocol Stack for Constrained IoT Systems
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) has gained huge popularity through its rapid advancements and wide applicability in real world applications that have transformed our lives. Communication plays an integral role in connecting IoT devices. For effective communication in IoT, the protocols that offer lightweight, secure and reliable communication without compromising the computational and energy limitations, of the employed constrained IoT devices are the need of hour. Literature reveals certain protocols such as CoAP, MQTT, XMPP, RESTFUL Services, 6LoWPAN, RPL etc, that can be deployed for carrying communication at different layers. This paper insight the various IoT protocols applied at different layers of IoT protocol suite and analyze the efficacy and reliability of these protocols on the basis of energy efficiency, security and lightweight nature of protocols.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A lot of effort has been put on the standardization of IoT protocols, leading to a more consolidated choice of a few alternatives.
“A lot of effort has been put on the standardization of IoT protocols [238][239].It has led to a more consolidated choice of a few alternatives [240].”
From Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models (2020) · cites this paper as [240]
Cites
Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications
Al-Fuqaha, A., Guizani, M., Mohammadi, M., Aledhari, M., & Ayyash, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2444095 · Cited by 8,630 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models
Minerva, R., Lee, G. M., & Crespi, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2020.2998530 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Survey, comparison and research challenges of IoT application protocols for smart farming
Glaroudis, D., Iossifides, A., & Chatzimisios, P. (2020) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2019.107037 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sharma, C., & Gondhi, N. K.
- Affiliations
- Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University (IN)
- ORCID
- Gondhi, Naveen Kumar
- Venue
- 2018 3rd International Conference On Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-02
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2899664370
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
- Keywords
- Internet of Things, IoT protocols, protocol stack, resource-constrained devices, energy efficiency, Internet of Things security, lightweight protocols, CoAP, MQTT, XMPP, REST API, 6LoWPAN, recurrent pregnancy loss, protocol comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
