Cited by 17Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

Tangle Ledger for Decentralized Learning

Schmid, Robert, Pfitzner, Bjarne, Beilharz, Jossekin, Arnrich, Bert, Polze, Andreas·2020·2020 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)

Abstract

Federated learning has the potential to make machine learning applicable to highly privacy-sensitive domains and distributed datasets. In some scenarios, however, a central server for aggregating the partial learning results is not available. In fully decentralized learning, a network of peer-to-peer nodes collaborates to form a consensus on a global model without a trusted aggregating party. Often, the network consists of Internet of Things (IoT) and Edge computing nodes.Previous approaches for decentralized learning map the gradient batching and averaging algorithm from traditional federated learning to blockchain architectures. In an open network of participating nodes, the threat of adversarial nodes introducing poisoned models into the network increases compared to a federated learning scenario which is controlled by a single authority. Hence, the decentralized architecture must additionally include a machine learning-aware fault tolerance mechanism to address the increased attack surface.We propose a tangle architecture for decentralized learning, where the validity of model updates is checked as part of the basic consensus. We provide an experimental evaluation of the proposed architecture, showing that it performs well in both model convergence and model poisoning protection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ipdpsw50202.2020.00144

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attacks such as poisoning attacks and data privacy threats can make FLchain systems vulnerable and risky, especially in distributed edge networks consisting of multiple devices and servers.

    “Attacks such as poisoning attacks [54] and data privacy threats can make FLchain systems vulnerable and risky especially in distributed edge networks consisting of multiple devices and servers.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmid, R., Pfitzner, B., Beilharz, J., Arnrich, B., & Polze, A.
Affiliations
Hasso Plattner Institute (DE)
Venue
2020 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops (IPDPSW)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-05
Pages
852-859
ISSN
2164-7062 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046868764
Cited by
17
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.14
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing, Workshops and Phd Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
decentralized learning, federated learning, model poisoning, consensus, fault tolerance, Internet of Things, edge computing, peer-to-peer networks, privacy-preserving machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review