The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
YOLO Algorithms Performance Comparison for Object Detection in Adverse Weather Conditions
Abstract
This paper aimed to evaluate and compare the performance of various versions of the YOLO object detection (OD) algorithm under adverse weather conditions, including rain, fog, snow, and sand, during both day and night. A dataset of images captured in these conditions was used to carry out the performance, in terms of OD, of the previous last five versions of YOLO (You Only Look Once), using a cloud-based platform, named Google Colab Notebook. The obtained results showed that YOLOv7 outperformed the other versions in terms of both speed and accuracy. It was the fastest algorithm, completing OD in under 17.4 milliseconds, and it had the highest detection rate for the most classes in the dataset. These findings suggest that YOLOv7 is the best option for OD in adverse weather conditions and under challenging lighting conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The application of YOLO models in the field of autonomous vehicles has proven transformative, particularly for enhancing real-time object detection capabilities [75].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [75]
Citations
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939
Anchor Box Optimization for Object Detection
Zhong, Y., Wang, J., Peng, J., & Zhang, L. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv45572.2020.9093498 · Cited by 118
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- OShea, An Introduction to Convolutional Neural Networks
- 2023, Google Colab
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 · DOI · Paper page
- Dai, R-FCN: Object Detection via Region-based Fully Convolutional Networks
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2437384 · DOI · Paper page
- Girshick, 2015, Fast R-CNN, 10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/iccons.2018.8663146 · DOI
- Rezatofighi, Generalized Intersection over Union: A Metric and A Loss for Bounding Box Regression, 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00075 · DOI · Paper page
- He, Bounding Box Regression with Uncertainty for Accurate Object Detection, 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00300 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_482 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-387-39940-9_492 · DOI
- 10.1007/11941439_114 · DOI · Paper page
- Redmon, YOL09000: Better, Faster, Stronger
- Redmon, YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement
- Janocha, On Loss Functions for Deep Neural Networks in Classification, 10.4467/20838476SI.16.004.6185 · DOI
- Lin, Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection, 10.1109/ICCV.2017.324 · DOI · Paper page
- Bochkovskiy, YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detection
- 10.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_23 · DOI · Paper page
- Jocher, 2020, YOLOv5 by Ultralytics
- Zoph, Neural Architecture Search with Reinforcement Learning
- Li, 2022, YOLOv6: A Single-Stage Object Detection Framework for Industrial Applications
- Lin, Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context, 10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of- the-art for real-time object detectors, 10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.00721 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhang, Bag of Freebies for Training Object Detection Neural Networks
- Ultralytics YOLOv8 Docs
- 2023, TensorFlow
- Keras: the Python deep learning API
- PyTorch
- Home - OpenCV
- NumPy
- CUDA Toolkit - Free Tools and Training | NVIDIA Developer
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Haimer, Z., Mateur, K., Farhan, Y., & Madi, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Université Ibn-Tofail (MA)
- National School of Applied Science, Ibn Tofail University,Advanced Systems Engineering Laboratory,Kenitra,Morocco
- ORCID
- Haimer, Zineb
- Venue
- 2023 3rd International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-05-18
- Pages
- 1-7
- OpenAlex
- W4381744548
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.64
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
- Keywords
- YOLO, object detection, severe weather, YOLOv7, YOLOv5, YOLOv4, YOLOv3, YOLOv2, rain, fog, snow, sand, night vision, detection speed and accuracy, performance comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review