Cited by 3,034Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Spatial Pyramid Pooling in Deep Convolutional Networks for Visual Recognition

Open access
He, Kaiming, Zhang, Xiangyu, Ren, Shaoqing, Sun, Jian·2014·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-10578-9_23

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the deep learning era, bootstrap was shortly discarded in object detection during 2014-2016.

    “In the deep learning era, due to the increase of computing power, bootstrap was shortly discarded in object detection during 2014-2016 [16-20].”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 4.1 (page unavailable) says the authors used standard hard negative mining, iterated once, to train their object-detection SVMs. That is contrary to citing this 2014 detector as evidence that bootstrapping had been discarded. The paper does not establish a 2014–2016 trend or attribute one to increased computing power. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • If exploited, image pyramids are used only at test time, creating an inconsistency between train/test-time inference.

    “and so, if exploited, image pyramids are used only at test time [15, 11, 16, 35], which creates an inconsistency between train/test-time inference.”

    From Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection (2017) · cites this paper as [15]

    Section 3.1.3 says earlier CNN approaches to multiple scales were mostly based on testing, but distinguishes this paper as training a single network with inputs of multiple sizes. The Multi-size training section specifies training at both 180×180 and 224×224. Thus this source does not support the claim that scales are exploited only at test time; it also does not state the alleged train/test inconsistency. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SPPNet is more than 20 times faster than R-CNN without sacrificing any detection accuracy (VOC07 mAP=59.2%).

    “SPPNet is more than 20 times faster than R-CNN without sacrificing any detection accuracy (VOC07 mAP=59.2%).”

    From Object Detection in 20 Years: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J.
Affiliations
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2014
Pages
346-361
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W2179352600
Cited by
3,034
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 211 · 2023: 286 · 2022: 279 · 2021: 306 · 2020: 280 · 2019: 423 · 2018: 373 · 2017: 324 · 2016: 218 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 25 · 2012: 1
FWCI
128.86
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
spatial pyramid pooling, image classification, object detection, feature pooling, computational efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review