The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The normal distributions transform: a new approach to laser scan matching
Abstract
Matching 2D range scans is a basic component of many localization and mapping algorithms. Most scan match algorithms require finding correspondences between the used features, i.e. points or lines. We propose an alternative representation for a range scan, the normal distributions transform. Similar to an occupancy grid, we subdivide the 2D plane into cells. To each cell, we assign a normal distribution, which locally models the probability of measuring a point. The result of the transform is a piecewise continuous and differentiable probability density, that can be used to match another scan using Newton's algorithm. Thereby, no explicit correspondences have to be established. We present the algorithm in detail and show the application to relative position tracking and simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM). First results on real data demonstrate, that the algorithm is capable to map unmodified indoor environments reliable and in real time, even without using odometry data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots
Thrun, S., Fox, D., Burgard, W., & Dellaert, F. (2001) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(01)00069-8 · Cited by 1,809
Globally Consistent Range Scan Alignment for Environment Mapping
Lu, F., & Milios, E. (1997) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1008854305733 · Cited by 1,304
Cited by
Scan registration for autonomous mining vehicles using 3D‐NDT
Magnusson, M., Lilienthal, A., & Duckett, T. (2007) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20204 · Cited by 771
Linking Points With Labels in 3D: A Review of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation
Xie, Y., Tian, J., & Zhu, X. X. (2020) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2019.2937630 · Cited by 482
Registration of large-scale terrestrial laser scanner point clouds: A review and benchmark
Dong, Z., Liang, F., Yang, B., Xu, Y., Zang, Y., Li, J., Wang, Y., Dai, W., Fan, H., Hyyppä, J., et al. (2020) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.03.013 · Cited by 438
Li, L., Yang, F., Zhu, H., Li, D., Li, Y., & Tang, L. (2017) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs9050433 · Cited by 283
The H3D Dataset for Full-Surround 3D Multi-Object Detection and Tracking in Crowded Urban Scenes
Patil, A., Malla, S., Gang, H., & Chen, Y.-T. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2019.8793925 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Biber, P., & Strasser, W.
- Venue
- Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2004-07-08
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 2743-2748
- OpenAlex
- W1567242735
- Cited by
- 1,554
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.32
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The normal distributions transform: a new approach to laser scan matching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/iros.2003.1249285
- The paper
- Biber, P., & Strasser, W. (2004). The normal distributions transform: a new approach to laser scan matching. Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453). https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2003.1249285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.